Bid 💥 @ffhyh 11💎 6d23h Bid @nwnvw 11💎 6d23h #888
Channel
🔥实时播报:官网竞拍@cc108
@cc108
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002604305384 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @cc108 @cc799 @gengshui @jj_rrrr |
| Description | 💥特价-每天更新: @cc815 用户名租售: @yhmzs tell: @cc816 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cc108 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 11:22 | 17 | no change |
| 14 Nov 2026, 10:47 | 17 | no change |
| 14 Nov 2026, 09:48 | 17 | no change |
| 14 Nov 2026, 09:47 | 17 | no change |
| 14 Nov 2026, 09:22 | 17 | no change |
| 14 Nov 2026, 08:47 | 17 | first reading |
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 14 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.35%
- avg views ÷ 17 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.3
- 60 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 60
- of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (14 November 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 75 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- ≈48,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Bid 💥 @vestirlo 11💎 6d23h #典藏礼物
Bid 💥 @jiaojue 104💎 13d0h Bid @uuvipp 104💎 13d7h
Bid 💥 @dustol 6.8💎 53m Bid @feathenr 11💎 6d23h Bid @banks_gram 13💎 13h47m #典藏nft
Bid 💥 @obeboshen 6.88💎 59m Bid @rsylus 11💎 6d23h #典藏品
Bid 💥 @rudra 69.3💎 1h31m #典藏
Bid 💥 @wyczo 5.8💎 23h59m Bid @bnytz 5.8💎 23h59m Bid @flupu 11💎 6d23h #同时
Bid 💥 @zheman 88💎 13d0h Bid @uuvip4 88💎 13d0h
Bid 💥 @coxoci 11💎 6d23h Bid @hilfmi 11💎 6d23h #又名
Bid 💥 @dustol 5.8💎 59m Bid @spilen 7💎 55m #NFT
Bid 💥 @rudra 63💎 1h37m Bid @ttpzp 11💎 6d23h Bid @ekyek 11💎 6d23h Bid @plzzp 11💎 6d23h Bid @udbbu 11💎 6d23h #nft
Bid 💥 @svipquan 88💎 13d0h Bid @xinpen 68💎 13d0h
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @cc108. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 147 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@n5688 · 132 posts特价🎁抢拍@cc815
@sviptejia · 82 postsc0678 j15888
@c0678 · 31 post4聪
@congcongcongcong · 21 postcy_777
@cy_777 · 41 postcz_8888 土鳖
@cz_8888 · 31 postg8i88
@g8i88 · 31 postgs_666
@gs_666 · 31 postiec888
@iec888 · 21 postjm_999 红袍
@jm_999 · 31 postk8o88
@k8o88 · 21 postkefurou rw_777
@kefurou · 11 postmhu888
@mhu888 · 31 postno088
@no088 · 21 postsvip6488 濒粹 吕老 栓头
@svip6488 · 31 postvip3427
@vip3427 · 21 post@vip6275
@vip6275 · 31 post@vip6862
@vip6862 · 21 postvip7619
@vip7619 · 31 postvip8586 两桌
@vip8586 · 21 postvip8922
@vip8922 · 21 postvip9956 4钻 看您
@vip9956 · 41 postw4988
@w4988 · 91 postz6088
@z6088 · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@richguy · 13 posts@rudra
@rudra · 3272 postsh
@uzbeksell · 12 postsde
@autohandeln · 21 postbaqibu 霸气不 yyllff CCzai 仔
@baqibu · 11 postbexruz
@bexruz8 · 11 postbm_666
@bm_666 · 21 postcz_8888 土鳖
@cz_8888 · 31 postunmmu
@czkkc · 11 postELON TR | UZ
@elon_tr · 1,7831 postfi880
@fi880 · 31 postGantengu
@Gantengu · 21 postiej888
@iej888 · 11 post@m9188
@m9188 · 41 postСлуга
@mancipium · 11 postPrincipal.
@princippal · 31 postseensms_uzb
@seensms_uzb · 21 postStill
@stillz · 21 postsw_999 孩子爹 朋友 神仙群
@sw_999 · 21 postvip7619
@vip7619 · 31 postvip9205
@vip9205 · 21 postا
@vvvif · 4011 postᖴiᖇE
@vvvlf · 1,1791 posty7988
@y7988 · 31 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔥实时播报:官网竞拍@cc108” (@cc108), 17 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cc108.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.