Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 魅语控射无限火力报告

Channel

魅语控射无限火力报告

@cby00917

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,801subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002031402703
TypeChannel
Username@cby00917
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cby00917

Growth

1,7711,8191,7959 August 2026 — 1,771 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,771 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,773 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,787 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,799 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,793 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,803 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,808 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,819 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,814 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,801 subscribers1,8019 August 20264 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,764–1,826 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 17:591,801-13
31 Aug 2026, 18:351,814-5
28 Aug 2026, 17:161,819+11
25 Aug 2026, 14:521,808+5
22 Aug 2026, 10:191,803+10
19 Aug 2026, 10:041,793-6
16 Aug 2026, 17:041,799+12
12 Aug 2026, 21:061,787+14
9 Aug 2026, 20:311,773+2
9 Aug 2026, 15:301,771no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:171,771first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 1,801 subscribers
Avg views / post
201
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (21 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total201
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
872.7%
👏218.2%
😁19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC443 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

19号越南妹妹 情绪价值到位技术一流 哥哥们预约私信可可🌹

2 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC968 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

脱敏训练:降低敏感度,增强控制力 脱敏训练就像是给你的丁丁穿上了一层 保护罩 让它在面对X刺激时不再那么敏感。 徒手私密就像在给爱车做保养一样, 从轻到重逐渐增加刺激力度 每次训练30分钟,就像每周去健身房锻炼一样,坚持就是胜利。

😁1

1 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

做服务我们是专业的哥哥们预约🌹私信可可 @cby9178

15 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC≈2,460 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

感谢推荐🌹感谢认可 哥哥预约私信可可😊 @cby9178

2

7 Jul 2026, 06:51 UTC≈2,130 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

19号技师好评➕ 预约私信可可 @cby9178

1

4 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC≈2,250 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

好评➕ 🌹19号技师越南妹子

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @cby00917. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“魅语控射无限火力报告” (@cby00917), 1,801 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cby00917.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.