«سنگ مرکب» و درپوش بهشکل لاکپشت (چین) «سنگ مرکب» یا (Inkstone) یکی از ابزارهای سنتی خوشنویسی چینی برای سابیدن و آماده کردن جوهر است. لاکپشتهای آبی و خاکی که نمادهای طول عمر و استقامت هستند، از دیرباز با پیشگویی در چین باستان پیوند داشتهاند. در این اثر، روی لاک هشت سهخطی (باگوا) حکاکی شده است که در کیهانشناسی تائوئیسم (Daoist) کاربرد دارد. Inkstone and cover in the shape of a turtle, China, 6th-7th century.

Channel
Archive (The Catcher in the Rye)
@caulfild2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,083subscribers
+368 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001325903398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caulfild2 |
| Description | 🏛 کانال اصلی: @caulfild |
| Created | 10 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caulfild2 |
Topic
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 06:40 | 12,083 | +1 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:15 | 12,082 | +8 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:55 | 12,074 | +26 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:07 | 12,048 | +36 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:08 | 12,012 | +3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:17 | 12,009 | +4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:59 | 12,005 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:44 | 12,003 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:26 | 12,001 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 12,002 | +7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:49 | 11,995 | +3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:49 | 11,992 | +4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:31 | 11,988 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 11,984 | +6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 11,978 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:34 | 11,979 | +16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:54 | 11,963 | +10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 11,953 | +8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 11,945 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 11,946 | first reading |
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 31.5%
- avg views ÷ 12,083 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,800
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (6 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 19,020 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,260
- Videos
- ≈73
- Links
- ≈736
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6m 19s
- Average length
- 1m 35s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The Captive, 1891. by E. Irving Couse
یک نقاشی معروف و بحثبرانگیز، به دلیل اشارات جنسی (که برای هنر آن دوره نسبتاً تند بود)، کلیشهسازی از بومیان آمریکا و (در مقابل) رمانتیکسازی آنها به عنوان «وحشی نجیب». در سال ۱۸۳۸، دکتر مارکوس ویتمن و همسرش به منطقه اورگان آمدند تا تحت حمایت هیئت مبلغان نیوانگلند، یک پایگاه مذهبی برای سرخپوستان کایوس (Cayuse) تأسیس کنند. با گذشت زمان، مهاجران نیز به این منطقه آمدند و در اطراف پایگاه ویتمن ساکن شدند. همهچیز خوب پی…
«ای عزیزترینِ پسران نزد پدرت، کدامین خیالات تو را اینگونه آشفته است؟ درنگ کن، و یکسره مقهورِ هراس مشو.» (۱۰۵۱) آگاممنون (پادشاه یونان) پس از سالها جنگ به خانه برمیگردد، اما همسرش کلیتمنسترا (که در غیاب او معشوقهای اختیار کرده بود) او را به قتل میرساند. سالها بعد، پسر آنها یعنی اورستس بزرگ میشود. خدایان (بهویژه آپولون) به او فرمان میدهند که وظیفه دارد انتقام خون پدرش را بگیرد. اورستس هم برای اجرای عدالت، ما…
«مژده» The Annunciation, 1898. by Henry Ossawa Tanner
این یکی از عجیبترین تصاویر در تاریخ سینماست و فیلم «درخشش» هرگز آن را توضیح نمیدهد. برای درک آن، باید به کتاب استیون کینگ رجوع کنید. سالها قبل، این هتل به «هوراس درونت»، مردی ثروتمند و قدرتمند، تعلق داشت. راجر معشوق او بود و برای جلب رضایتش دست به هر کاری میزد. یک شب، در یک مهمانی لباس مبدل، درونت تصمیم گرفت راجر را در مقابل همه تحقیر کند. او را مجبور کرد لباس سگ بپوشد، روی زمین بخزد و مانند یک حیوان خانگی شیرین…
محمدکریم پیرنیا (۱۲۹۹، یزد - ۱۳۷۶ تهران) استاد دانشگاه، محقق، نویسنده، نظریهپرداز معماری ایرانی © seyyedhoseintabatabaei
صادق هدایت بهقدری شیفتهی ویرجینیا وولف بوده که در رمان «بوف کور» بخشهایی از رمان «خیزابها» رو که سال ۱۹۳۱ میلادی و پنج سال قبل از بوف کور چاپ شده رو خطبهخط ترجمه کرده، در ادامه دو نمونه رو مینویسم: وولف: «چقدر خاموشی بهترین چیزهاست…بهتر است مثل مرغ دریایی بال و پر خود را بگسترانم و تنها بنشینم.» هدایت: «خاموشی بهترین چیزهاست. بهتر است آدم مثل بوتیمار کنار دریا بال و پر خود را بگستراند و تنها بنشیند.» وولف: …
عکس اول: تهران، خیابان فردوسی، سر خیابان کوشک (تقوی فعلی) به سمت میدان فردوسی، سال ۱۳۵۲ عکس دوم: عکس جدیدی از همین محله © Panjerehei be dirooz
تضاد طبقاتی در این نقاشی از مشتریان یک بار در فیلادلفیا بهخوبی نشان داده شده. در اینجا، زنی از طبقهی کارگر که همراه با کسی دیگر سرگرم نوشیدن یک بطری آبجو است، نگاهِ مردی تنها را به خود کِشیده که شامپانی گرانبها سفارش داده است. یکی از منتقدان امروزی، این مرد مایهدار را چنین توصیف کرد: «عنکبوتی که در کمین مگس نشسته است.» The Rathskeller, 1901. by John Sloan
The Travelers and the Giant, 1869. by Henry Marsh (After John La Farge)
Batman: Dark Victory #3, 1999. by Tim Sale
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @caulfild2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@caulfild · 33,674
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
@owrsi · 55,228
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@CinemaParadisooo · 22,947
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
@herfeh_honarmand · 21,943
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@nabayad_mikhandim · 31,567
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
@psychology_personaa · 20,706
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Archive (The Catcher in the Rye)” (@caulfild2), 12,083 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caulfild2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.