Вам похолоднее или потеплее?☺️
❤23🤩2🎉1

Channel
@catrice_russia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
11,938subscribers
-58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001652333962 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @catrice_russia |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/catrice_russia |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 11,938 | +16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 11,922 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 11,926 | -12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 11,938 | -27 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 11,965 | -61 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 12,026 | -62 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 12,088 | -44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:33 | 12,132 | -64 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:24 | 12,196 | -262 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 12,458 | +435 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 12,023 | +55 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 11,968 | +16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 11,952 | +59 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 11,893 | +63 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 11,830 | +25 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 11,805 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 11,815 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 11,825 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 11,828 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 11,832 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 25,626 |
| Reactions total | 2,623 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 22:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,312 reactions across 56 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,027 | 57.0% | |
| 🔥 | 540 | 10.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 482 | 9.07% | |
| 🥰 | 311 | 5.85% | |
| 🤩 | 170 | 3.20% | |
| 🎉 | 143 | 2.69% | |
| 👍 | 143 | 2.69% | |
| 🏆 | 136 | 2.56% | |
| 👏 | 101 | 1.90% | |
| 💔 | 78 | 1.47% | |
| 😍 | 53 | 0.998% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 0.904% | |
| 🤔 | 22 | 0.414% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 0.395% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 0.188% | |
| 🌭 | 8 | 0.151% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 0.132% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 0.132% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.094% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,566 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вам похолоднее или потеплее?☺️
❤23🤩2🎉1
Если отпуск далеко, загар всё ещё ближе, чем кажется. 🌊 Бронзер для тела Seashell Stories от Catrice добавляет коже легкий оттенок оттенок загара и естественное влажное сияние. Лёгкий аромат кокоса отвечает за пляжное настроение, а формула с пептидами подчёркивает сияние кожи и помогает создать мягкий скульптурирующий эффект.🥥 Наносим на плечи, ключицы и другие открытые участки тела и официально увеличиваем количе…
❤9🥰9🎉2
Какой оттенок румян из нашей новой лимитированной коллекции Seashell Stories вам понравился больше? Голосуйте реакцией: 🔥 за розоватый C01 Saltwater Crush ❤ за коралловый C02 Peach Perfect
❤53🔥31🎉3
Выбирать придется из двух оттенков. Или не придется, если взять оба.😁
❤36🥰5❤🔥2
Румяна, которые можно носить как брелок?🐚 Румяна из нашей новой лимитированной коллекции Seashell Stories выглядят как маленькая морская ракушка, а благодаря формату с держателем-кольцом их можно взять с собой и поправить румянец в любой момент. Внутри нежная кремовая текстура с ароматом кокоса. Она легко распределяется по коже, даёт легкое покрытие и оставляет сияющий финиш с эффектом влажной кожи. Нанесите, раст…
🥰25❤21🎉3
Для тех, кто грустит из-за наступившей осени, у нас есть замечательная новость! Встречайте новую лимитированную коллекцию Catrice Seashell Stories! Она создана, чтобы вернуть вам то самое ощущение тёплого моря, шепота ракушек и солнечного света на коже. Никакого хмурого осеннего настроения — только сияние, свежесть и лёгкость. С этой коллекцией ваш макияж просто засветится. Каждый оттенок — будто привет из лета в …
❤41🥰12🎉8🔥5
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. Nina (@ninners86) Напишите нам в сообщения канала в течение двух недель. ✔️Проверить результаты
👏64❤9😢8👎6🎉5💔3
Ну что за красота!🥰
❤60🤩27🥰18
Свадьба, вечеринка или обычная суббота, в которую захотелось быть главной героиней дня.✨ Хайлайтер BRIDES & BESTIES добавляет коже деликатное холодное золотистое сияние. Полупрозрачная текстура ложится лёгкой вуалью и красиво ловит свет без ощущения «кажется, с сиянием мы немного увлеклись». Для невесты, подружки невесты и всех, кому для шампанского и сияния особый повод не нужен. 🥂
❤43🥰21🤩10🔥3
И вот такое "до-после" с корректором Under Eye Brightener.😍
❤45🔥21🤔8👎2
Маскировка тёмных кругов под глазами выходит на новый уровень! Корректор для области вокруг глаз Under Eye Brightener благодаря своему оттенку уменьшает видимость синяков под глазами и очень естественно подсвечивает кожу. Он не будет скатываться и западать в морщинки даже на сухой коже благодаря нежнейшей кремовой текстуре и составу с увлажняющими и питательными компонентами: гиалуроновой кислотой и маслом ши.
❤49🔥20🤩8
Какой набор косметики Catrice вы бы выбрали для себя? Голосуйте реакцией: 🔥 за первый ❤ за второй
❤148🔥76👏17
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @catrice_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чем вы пользуетесь?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Косметика Catrice” (@catrice_russia), 11,938 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catrice_russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.