Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CATHERINE ENI

Channel

CATHERINE ENI

@catherine_en

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

402subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002159838001
TypeChannel
Username@catherine_en
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/catherine_en

Growth

4024144087 August 2026 — 414 subscribers8 August 2026 — 414 subscribers16 August 2026 — 410 subscribers23 August 2026 — 407 subscribers29 August 2026 — 402 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 400–416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 20:34402-5
23 Aug 2026, 09:34407-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:25410-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:34414no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:36414first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 30 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53438725739627312363626.7%
custom 54519872516742327592820.7%
custom 52831333526211213011813.3%
custom 54381491290395249841611.9%
🔥1410.4%
😍1410.4%
custom 524948436262114185596.67%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 May 2026, 09:50 UTC299 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Befree в этом сезоне выпускают какие-то супер стильные босоножки 👠 Почти Dior, но за 3500₽ 🙈

custom 545198725167423275913custom 54381491290395249847🔥5custom 52831333526211213011custom 53438725739627312361

16 Apr 2026, 13:54 UTC512 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это что за люкс в Gloria Jeans 💛 Бомбер с трендовым воротником стойкой в идеальном песочном цвете

custom 528313335262112130111custom 53438725739627312366🔥4custom 54381491290395249842custom 52494843626211418551

3 Apr 2026, 10:30 UTC457 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Классный клатч замечен в Befree 🐈‍⬛💔 В этом сезоне все чаще клатчи встречаются не только в вечерних образах, но и в повседневных Определенно стоит присмотреться!

custom 534387257396273123611🔥5custom 52494843626211418554custom 52831333526211213012

31 Mar 2026, 20:37 UTC290 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Делюсь образами для вдохновениями на ночь 💌

custom 545198725167423275911custom 53438725739627312368😍4custom 54381491290395249843

31 Mar 2026, 20:37 UTC240 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Неуловимые джинсы от ROSI появились в наличии 🌺♥️

😍9custom 52494843626211418554custom 54381491290395249844custom 53438725739627312362

30 Mar 2026, 18:35 UTC188 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Любимая Марго Робби в кампейне Chanel 👜

custom 53438725739627312368custom 52831333526211213014custom 54519872516742327594😍1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @catherine_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CATHERINE ENI” (@catherine_en), 402 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catherine_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.