Channel
@cases_and_reviews_irim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002188395016 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cases_and_reviews_irim |
| Description | Канал создан для ознакомления с моими работами Связь: @irimmmmm |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 24 August 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cases_and_reviews_irim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 1 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 1 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2024 to 8 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aix lab - производство фарм техники Запрос: увеличить количество аудитории в канале Сложность: очень узкая ца (менеджеры/руководители/партнеры компаний, специализирующихся на фарм технике) Сделано: разработана стратегия продвижения, включающая работу сайта, работу с партнерами, инвайтинг целевой аудитории, посевы в каналах фарм мероприятий #Telegram
❤1
Канал Авито для репетиторов, настроили комментинг (относительно недорогой способ продвижения в тг) вот такой прирост за два месяца #Telegram
❤1
Ладно, обновлю кейсы здесь тоже
Ниша - доставка роллов по коммунарке Сложность - доставка осуществляется только в 2 ЖК, занимались поиском блогеров на бартер во всех источниках Результат работы с тремя блогерами: целевые подписчики, заявки в боте, блогеры стали клиентами (в последствии до 550 чел раскачали) #telegram
❤1
Увеличиваем активность и количество подписчиков в телеграм канале по психологии #Telegram
❤1
Привлечение заявок в частный аквапарк (работу начали в конце декабря) #Telegram
❤1
#отзывы
Закупили несколько реклам для канала психологии, стоимость подписчика 32₽ 🔥 #Telegram
Телеграм канал по доставке роллов #Telegram
Оформление #Telegram
Компания, занимающаяся ставками на спорт #отзывы
С нуля создали канал для бренда украшений, работаем над вовлеченностью аудитории #Telegram
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cases_and_reviews_irim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IRIM | кейсы & отзывы” (@cases_and_reviews_irim), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cases_and_reviews_irim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.