Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 一起讀判決

Channel

一起讀判決

@casebf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

140subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669327168
TypeChannel
Username@casebf
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/casebf

Growth

1401421417 August 2026 — 142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 142 subscribers14 August 2026 — 141 subscribers22 August 2026 — 140 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140–142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 11:48140-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:36141-1
8 Aug 2026, 22:01142no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:33142first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1337.1%
1234.3%
👏25.71%
🤔25.71%
💩12.86%
😁12.86%
😐12.86%
😱12.86%
🤓12.86%
🤯12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2023 to 25 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2024, 03:11 UTC313 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Y5daTGnj7t0?si=Lb3A4DYAFvepGqJV

💩1🤓1🤯1

6 Jul 2024, 05:46 UTC385 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://judgement.com.tw/2024/07/06/podcast-s2-ep8/

👏2

28 Nov 2023, 15:37 UTC466 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

最近有一部片「拿破崙」上映,雖然沒看這部片,但談到拿破崙,除了他英偉的功業外,對法律人來說,更重要的是他執政期間,著手制定的「法國民法典」,又稱為拿破崙法典。 法國民法典在1804年問世,隨著拿破崙四處征戰,進一步影響到其他國家民法的制定。無怪拿破崙曾說,我最偉大的事業,不是打贏四十場勝仗,滑鐵盧一戰就讓所有戰績一筆勾銷。但有一樣東西是不會被人忘記的,那就是我的「民法典」。 法國民法典把法國大革命的精神,自由與平等放進民法典裡面,強調所有權不可被侵犯、契約自由。比如,其中第8條規定:「所有的法國人都享有民事權利。」體現了平等的觀念,就好比我們現在的民法第6條:「人之權利能力,始於出生,終於死亡。」只要是人,不管是什麼人,一律平等的有享受權利、負擔義務的能力。 法國民法典的體例和我們現在的民法不太一樣,我們現在的民法有5編:總則、債、物權、親屬跟繼承,這是1896年德國民法典的體例。法國民法典則有3編:人、物(財產及所有權)

5

25 Nov 2023, 15:25 UTC281 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

憲法奕修你第二季 EP2:醫生以個人名義打廣告合不合法?112年憲判字第17號怎麼說? apple:https://reurl.cc/v6z3Lk kkbox:https://reurl.cc/q0RzYy firstory:https://reurl.cc/p5NnK8 spotify:https://reurl.cc/RyVn2r

👍1

25 Nov 2023, 15:22 UTC257 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

[憲法奕修你第二季] EP1:112年憲判字第16號-老闆給不出退休金該怎麼辦?兼談關廠工人案 firstory:https://reurl.cc/V4vmpQ kkbox:https://reurl.cc/NymNrQ spotify:https://reurl.cc/XmYak0 apple:https://reurl.cc/A0ebgY

👍1

15 Aug 2023, 06:32 UTC293 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

最新一集上線,也是本季倒數第二集。 https://podcasts.apple.com/tw/podcast/%E4%B8%80%E8%B5%B7%E8%AE%80%E5%88%A4%E6%B1%BA/id1606269045?i=1000624446216

😁1

13 Aug 2023, 02:24 UTC218 viewsread 8 August 2026

昨天晚上半夜錄完「憲法奕修你」關於週五的毒品憲法判決,這次特別來賓是司改會的呂政諺律師,他們很早就注意到這個條文有違憲可能,對這個聲請案有很深入的研究,節目經剪輯後,會盡快上架。 請在各大podcast平台搜尋「一起讀判決」。

13 Aug 2023, 00:53 UTC190 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

大法官在這次憲法判決,就違反毒品危害防制條例製造運輸販賣第一級毒品罪,在符合三個要件的情況下,可以額外獲得一次減刑: 第一,無其他犯罪。 第二,情節極為輕微、顯可憫恕。 第三,即便用刑法第59條減刑,仍情輕法重。 大法官講的「無其他犯罪」是什麼意思不是很確定,是本案行為中無其他犯罪,還是不能有過前科、前案紀錄不得而知。 但檢視大法官受理的五位聲請人,都是第一次犯罪的情況,看起來有點像後者。 如果是這樣,就會讓人想起775號解釋累犯案,當時大法官說:「#不分情節,基於累犯者有其特別惡性及對刑罰反應力薄弱等立法理由,#一律加重最低本刑,於不符合刑法第59條所定要件之情形下,致生行為人所受之刑罰超過其所應負擔罪責之個案,其人身自由因此遭受過苛之侵害部分,對人民受憲法第8條保障之人身自由所為限制,#不符憲法罪刑相當原則,牴觸憲法第23條比例原則。」 結果這次大法官卻採取了被他宣告違憲的「累犯」一樣規範模式,單純用「無其他犯罪」作

👍1

12 Aug 2023, 04:32 UTC159 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#草稿 #頭粉搶先看 昨天的憲法判決雖然只處理了8位聲請人,實際上大法官做了2500次的裁判憲法審查,但並沒有表明他的標準是什麼。 這次的憲法判決的釋憲標的,是毒品危害防制條例第4條第1項:「製造、運輸、販賣第一級毒品者,處死刑或無期徒刑;處無期徒刑者,得併科新臺幣三千萬元以下罰金。」 第一級毒品最常見的是海洛英,但條文不管販賣、運輸的量多少,最低的法定刑就是無期徒刑。這個問題並不是第一次來到大法官,476號解釋就曾經針對毒品危害防制條例前身「肅清煙毒條例」相同的規定,作出合憲解釋。最新的憲法判決,大法官則做出違憲解釋,變更了先前的見解。 判決主文說:「惟對諸如無其他犯罪行為,且依其販賣行為態樣、數量、對價等,可認屬情節極為輕微,顯可憫恕之個案,縱適用刑法第59條規定酌減其刑,仍嫌情輕法重,致罪責與處罰不相當。」 這種情況下,憲法判決多給了一次減刑機會。 依照刑法第65條第2項:「無期徒刑減輕者,為二十年以下十五年以

👍1😐1

10 Aug 2023, 15:57 UTC125 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/100064660183237/posts/pfbid02rtW6vPtZ9nXSD2iW13QDYBHVPCesHtMJRJYjJGr3CyPy5AzmHAbRLW3XAbmQ2TVHl/?mibextid=cr9u03

👍1

9 Aug 2023, 23:28 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

<增訂無正當理由提供帳戶罪後,修法前的行為要不要罰?> 洗錢防制法最近剛修正,新法在112年6月14日施行,增定了第15-1條跟第15-2條規定。 第15-2條規定任何人不能將金融帳戶交付給他人使用,如果違反的話,依照該條第2項規定,會由警察機關進行告誡。接著第3項規定了三種情況會有刑事責任,處3年以下有期徒刑、拘役、科或併科100萬元以下罰金。 第一,有對價的交付,包括期約或收受對價。 第二,交付或提供的帳戶在三個以上。 第三,經過警察機關告誡後,五年內再犯。 問題來了,單純交付帳戶,而沒有收受對價的情況,在修法之前,法官可能認為構成刑法幫助詐欺罪或幫助一般洗錢罪;同樣的行為,在修法之後,會不會讓評價發生變化?算不算法律有修正? 在新法上路之後這兩個月內,司法實務產生了不同的見解。 高雄高分院112年度金上訴字第144號刑事判決認為,新法針對無償提供帳戶的情況採取的是先行政、後刑事的立法方式,五年內再犯才會落入刑事

😱1

7 Aug 2023, 01:19 UTC144 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

跟八尺門的辯護人唐導演的對談podcast上線了,歡迎大家收聽。 https://podcasts.apple.com/tw/podcast/%E4%B8%80%E8%B5%B7%E8%AE%80%E5%88%A4%E6%B1%BA/id1606269045?i=1000623611576

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @casebf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“一起讀判決” (@casebf), 140 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/casebf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.