tik tok update!
๐ฅ2๐ก1

Channel
@carviszzz
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004411057356 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @carviszzz |
| Description | เญจเง ๐พ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ เญจเง โง ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐๐ โง โข ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ โข ๐ฐ๐๐๐ โข ๐ฒ๐๐ โข ๐ณ๐๐๐ie โข ๐บ๐๐๐e๐ โฆ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 9 August 2026โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/carviszzz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 10 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 10 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (9 August 2026 โ 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 555 |
| Reactions total | 99 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
99 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 24 | 24.2% | |
| ๐ก | 17 | 17.2% | |
| ๐ฅ | 16 | 16.2% | |
| ๐ | 10 | 10.1% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 8 | 8.08% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 6.06% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 6.06% | |
| ๐คฎ | 6 | 6.06% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 2.02% | |
| ๐ณ | 2 | 2.02% | |
| โก | 1 | 1.01% | |
| ๐คฏ | 1 | 1.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @carviszzz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
tik tok update!
๐ฅ2๐ก1
โฆ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ป๐๐๐ป๐๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฆ https://www.tiktok.com/@carviscov_oi?_r=1&_t=ZS-98nBKWSiM3Z เญจเง ๐ญ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ โก เญจเง ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โฆ
โค2๐ก1
๐คฉ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ชฝ๐ณ๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ๐ณ๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ๐ด๐ฉ๐ป๐ฐ โ ๐ฐ๐บ๐ป๐ท ๐ถ๐ญ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐ โ ๐บ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ ๐ป๐๐ ๐ด๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ โข BABYMONSTER ๐พ17.03.2015 ๐ฆ๐ด๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐. ๐ฆ
โค2๐2๐ก2โก1๐1๐ฅ1
๐๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ชฝ ๐ณ๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐บ๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฅผ๐ด๐ฉ๐ป๐ฐ โ ๐ฌ๐ต๐ป๐ฑ ๐น๐ญ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐ โ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ง16.09.2010 ๐ฆ โ ๐พ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐. โ ๐ฆ
โค4๐2๐2๐ฅ1๐ก1
๐คฉ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ ๐ฆด๐บ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆด๐ด๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆด๐ด๐ฉ๐ป๐ฐ โ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ญ๐ฑ ๐ฆด๐ญ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐ โ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ โข ๐น๐ถ๐บร ๐ฆ25.04.2012 ๐ฆ๐พ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐.๐ฆ
๐3๐2๐ก2โค1๐ฅ1
๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค ๐๐ณ๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐ด๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ด๐ฉ๐ป๐ฐ โ ๐ฌ๐ต๐ญ๐ท ๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐ โ ๐ป๐ต๐ป โข ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐พ10.06.2014 ๐ฆ๐ด๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐ฐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐.๐ฆ
โค2๐2๐ก2๐ฅ1
๐คฉ๐ณ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค ๐คฉ ๐ด๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ซฅ ๐บ๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ด๐ฉ๐ป๐ฐ โ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ป๐ท ๐โโฌ ๐ญ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐ โ ๐ด๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โข ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ป ๐ 23.03.2011 ๐ฆ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐, ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐. ๐ฆ
โค2๐2๐ก2๐ฅ1
ะกะบะพัะพ ะฟัะพัะฐะนะปั)!
๐ณ2
ะะฐะบ ะฒะฐั ะดะตะฝะตะบ?ยฟ
๐ฅ2
ะะฐะบ ะฒะฐั ะดะตะฝะตะบ?ยฟ ะถะดะตัะต ะฟัะพัะฐะนะปั?
โค6๐ก2
https://t.me/boost/carviszzz ะะพะปะพััะตะผ ๐ซถ๐ปโจ
๐6๐ก1
ะะพะดะทะบะฐะทะพัะบะฐ ๐ซถ๐ปโจ ะฃะทะฝะฐะตัะต ะณะพะปะพัะพะบ?ยฟ๐๐
โค3๐ฅ2๐ก1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @carviszzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank โ 1,384,279 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ช๐ป๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ผโ (@carviszzz), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/carviszzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.