Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CARTEL VIDÉOS

Channel

CARTEL VIDÉOS

@cartel2videos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56,080subscribers

+1,146 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002931353079
TypeChannel
Username@cartel2videos
Created5 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cartel2videos

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

54,93459,11257,0237 August 2026 — 54,934 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,934 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,187 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,670 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56,061 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,311 subscribers12 August 2026 — 56,608 subscribers13 August 2026 — 56,663 subscribers14 August 2026 — 56,874 subscribers16 August 2026 — 57,098 subscribers17 August 2026 — 57,321 subscribers18 August 2026 — 57,528 subscribers19 August 2026 — 57,766 subscribers20 August 2026 — 57,953 subscribers21 August 2026 — 58,123 subscribers22 August 2026 — 58,403 subscribers24 August 2026 — 58,820 subscribers25 August 2026 — 58,896 subscribers26 August 2026 — 58,947 subscribers27 August 2026 — 59,050 subscribers28 August 2026 — 59,112 subscribers29 August 2026 — 58,941 subscribers31 August 2026 — 58,776 subscribers1 September 2026 — 58,560 subscribers2 September 2026 — 58,387 subscribers3 September 2026 — 58,238 subscribers4 September 2026 — 58,005 subscribers7 September 2026 — 57,514 subscribers10 September 2026 — 56,969 subscribers12 September 2026 — 56,726 subscribers14 September 2026 — 56,475 subscribers15 September 2026 — 56,259 subscribers18 September 2026 — 56,080 subscribers56,0807 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1,146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,307–59,739 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:0156,080-179
15 Sept 2026, 21:3756,259-216
14 Sept 2026, 04:1956,475-251
12 Sept 2026, 14:2256,726-243
10 Sept 2026, 15:5956,969-545
7 Sept 2026, 14:1657,514-491
4 Sept 2026, 18:1558,005-233
3 Sept 2026, 00:5558,238-149
2 Sept 2026, 01:2858,387-173
1 Sept 2026, 01:5958,560-216
31 Aug 2026, 01:5758,776-165
29 Aug 2026, 23:0458,941-171
28 Aug 2026, 20:1359,112+62
27 Aug 2026, 20:1859,050+103
26 Aug 2026, 19:2658,947+51
25 Aug 2026, 17:0858,896+76
24 Aug 2026, 15:2458,820+417
22 Aug 2026, 23:0758,403+280
21 Aug 2026, 15:0758,123+170
20 Aug 2026, 12:5357,953first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 5 November 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.51%
avg views ÷ 56,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
849
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held22 (5 November 202511 September 2026)
Views total15,274
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 03:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

315 reactions across 3 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22370.8%
💩299.21%
🫡206.35%
👍185.71%
🔥175.40%
41.27%
👎41.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @cartel2videos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CARTEL VIDÉOS” (@cartel2videos), 56,080 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cartel2videos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.