Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Carey Wedler

Channel

Carey Wedler

@careywedler

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,373subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541736385
TypeChannel
Username@careywedler
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/careywedler

Growth

1,3731,3741,373.56 August 2026 — 1,373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,374 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,373 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,373–1,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 23:321,373-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:401,374+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:481,373no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:521,373first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

981 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32232.8%
🔥20821.2%
💯15716.0%
👏828.36%
👍727.34%
❤‍🔥454.59%
202.04%
🏆181.83%
👌141.43%
😍111.12%
🤬60.612%
🥰60.612%
🙏50.51%
👻30.306%
😱30.306%
🤣30.306%
😁20.204%
👀10.102%
🕊10.102%
🖕10.102%
1 further kind10.102%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 981reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC≈2,950 views47 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Watching politicians and Americans celebrate "250 years of freedom" on the 4th of July inspired this video! All these very real and tangible infringements aside, I do believe freedom begins and ends in our consciousness—and that the first step toward achieving it is breaking free of the illusion that anyone has the right to rule over you...even if you voted for them and there's a revered piece of paper (the Constitu

19🔥17💯7👍2👏2

18 Jun 2026, 18:14 UTC≈1,410 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Surprise, surprise: the government had something to do with it. But looking at the havoc government has wreaked, anarchy should be looking pretty good to people. 😏 Read my additional thoughts about anarchism (including the economic rifts among anarchists and the "iT cOuLd NeVeR wOrK" argument) on my Substack: https://pleasuretoburn.substack.com/p/how-anarchy-became-such-a-dirty-word

19🔥12❤‍🔥5👍1👏1

4 Jun 2026, 18:23 UTC≈3,000 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

If you're skeptical of Big Tech, digital IDs, and biometrics, you might want to know about this project. I strongly encourage you to read my in-depth article on my Substack, which goes much deeper into this topic: https://pleasuretoburn.substack.com/p/do-you-trust-sam-altmans-orb-to-assign 👀🧐

20🔥10👍42😱1

6 May 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,620 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Some lesser-known history…👻🤫 This doesn’t mean “Iran government good, US government bad”—just that warmongering propagandists are exceptional at the art of selective omission.

29👌75💯2🔥2

30 Apr 2026, 21:51 UTC≈1,500 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

All the violence here is INHERENTLY political: law enforcement and soldiers are carrying out the dictates and commands of politicians who gain power through the political system, which requires violence to function. Those who can’t see this have the system’s claws in their brains.

💯28👏54👍21🏆1

8 Apr 2026, 22:04 UTC≈2,540 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

The people in these clips are either willing propagandists or useful idiots, however well intended. Anyone who truly paid attention to Trump’s first term knew he was just as much of a warmonger as his predecessors—and that baked into the “no new wars” rhetoric was the reality that he continued (and in many cases intensified) the existing ones.

21🔥18👍3💯3🤣3

3 Apr 2026, 17:48 UTC≈2,610 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

It’s taboo to talk about but 🤷🏻‍♀️

💯14❤‍🔥9👏6👻322👀1

24 Mar 2026, 00:50 UTC≈4,830 views65 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

It's actually insane how many people believe this lie about the war in Iran. 🤫💥

💯3210👍6🔥6👏4❤‍🔥3😍2🤔1

5 Mar 2026, 22:00 UTC≈1,940 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Not ALL Americans (but far too many). Stop seeking solutions from those creating the problems. 💡✌🏻 Here's a comprehensive three-part series I wrote on what I believe are *actual* solutions: https://pleasuretoburn.substack.com/p/the-world-is-fckedso-whats-your-solution

🔥25❤‍🔥6👏4👍322🏆2

28 Feb 2026, 19:57 UTC≈3,860 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

WAR WITH IRAN: What you’re not being told… The people who rule this world will never acknowledge this. 🤫💣 (Watch the whole video before commenting 🙃)

💯2915🙏5👌3🔥3👏2🕊1😍1

12 Feb 2026, 22:28 UTC≈2,830 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

The wildest true crime story in history...💀🗡️ It's second (possibly) only to disease, which is fitting because this killer is its own special kind of disease. Additional thoughts and caveats on this video are available on the Substack version of this post: https://pleasuretoburn.substack.com/p/whos-the-biggest-killer-of-all Subscribe to my Substack: https://pleasuretoburn.substack.com/ If you appreciate my conten

22💯9🔥72🏆2

6 Feb 2026, 00:51 UTC≈2,190 views63 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

MAGA 2024 vs. 2026 Or: When you stand for absolutely nothing 😳🥴

21👏20👍7🔥62🥰2😁2🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @careywedler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 171,389 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Carey Wedler” (@careywedler), 1,373 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/careywedler.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.