Channel
@captainblazerofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
679subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001365301522 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @captainblazerofficial |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 12 May 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/captainblazerofficial |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 679 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 680 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 684 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 688 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 689 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 689 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 May 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
**HEY CIURMA! QUALE VIDEO VUOI GUARDARE?**
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Quale video preferisci?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
QUALE VIDEO PREFERITE GUARDARE?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Buona domenica a tutti! Quale video vorreste vedere domani?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
E allora facciamo un sondaggino per riniziare ahahaha
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
esiste qualcuno?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
da quanto tempo non scrivevo in questo gruppo raga?
Ciao ciurma! Quale video di FORTNITE vorreste guardare?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ho preparato delle belle idee per voi, votate la migliore!! ❤️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Finalmente tornano i vostri amati sondaggi ciurma ahahah
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ciao ciurma! Quale video vorreste vedere domani?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Che caldo che fa oggi...
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @captainblazerofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
**HEY CIURMA! QUALE VIDEO VUOI GUARDARE?**
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Quale video preferisci?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
QUALE VIDEO PREFERITE GUARDARE?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Buona domenica a tutti! Quale video vorreste vedere domani?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
E allora facciamo un sondaggino per riniziare ahahaha
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
esiste qualcuno?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2019 to 6 December 2019. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CaptainBlazer Sondaggi” (@captainblazerofficial), 679 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/captainblazerofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.