Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Captain Works

Channel

Captain Works

@captain_works

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

3,735subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002049592110
TypeChannel
Username@captain_works
Created9 April 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/captain_works

Growth

3,7353,8303,782.57 August 2026 — 3,830 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,825 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,807 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,793 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,784 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,774 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,761 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,749 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,735 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,721–3,844 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 13:363,735-14
27 Aug 2026, 04:293,749-12
24 Aug 2026, 10:443,761-13
20 Aug 2026, 21:333,774-10
17 Aug 2026, 23:413,784-9
15 Aug 2026, 00:143,793-14
11 Aug 2026, 09:523,807-18
8 Aug 2026, 13:513,825-5
7 Aug 2026, 20:333,830first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 9 April 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,066 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍40037.5%
🔥25423.8%
22521.1%
👏787.32%
❤‍🔥545.07%
💩353.28%
🥰80.75%
👎50.469%
👨‍💻40.375%
😁30.281%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,066reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2024 to 9 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2024, 14:54 UTC≈32,800 views727 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❤️‍🩹 In short, a kind product that offers a very simple yet clear benefit! A special place in our community of builders is reserved for kind launches. Kamil is a participant in our community of builders and now the creator of not just a useful, but also a very kind product. We followed our standard scheme: 1️⃣ We found existing demand in search, rather than reinventing the wheel. We looked at the market and disc

🔥207👍203158👏71❤‍🔥54💩30🥰4

9 Apr 2024, 14:54 UTC≈27,500 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍263

9 Apr 2024, 14:53 UTC≈27,400 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🕺It's time to introduce you to what the participants in our community of builders are up to) Based on this channel, we have a community of builders where we launch micro-products using the following method: 1️⃣ We find existing demand through search, rather than coming up with an idea out of thin air. 2️⃣ We create a future micro-product to meet this demand. We aim to solve the user's problem as simply as possible

👍2319🔥18💩5👎1🥰1

9 Apr 2024, 14:53 UTC≈9,940 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍214

9 Apr 2024, 14:53 UTC≈9,580 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🖤 In short, having your own product helps... in hiring. I received feedback from someone who created their product in our community of builders. The gist is: "man, when you have 1K users, you perceive tasks at your main job differently, and sometimes you're amazed at the thoughts of colleagues who don't have their own products." I’ll add from myself. You can’t imagine how much more advantageous it is for a busine

👍2211👏3

9 Apr 2024, 14:52 UTC≈7,350 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😳 In short, in 2024, we launched a calculator 🙂 This amusing example perfectly illustrates important aspects of our method of launching in the community of builders. Who even needs another calculator in 2024? Let’s dig into this. 1️⃣ Remember where we start? We don't judge by ourselves but look for existing demand in search. We did the same here and were surprised to learn that in 2024, calculators are actively se

👍27🔥5😁3

9 Apr 2024, 14:51 UTC≈6,010 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💔 In short, venture approach VS launching micro-products. Some people compare major venture stories with our approach to launching micro-products. I decided to explain why this comparison is incorrect and what key differences exist between them. 1️⃣ The venture approach is about huge future capitalization. Usually, it involves dominating an industry. 📍In venture capital, investors and funds are not interested in

👍16🔥151

9 Apr 2024, 14:51 UTC≈4,510 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎒 In short, I decided to make a summary of how we launch micro-products in a single post. The most important thing. No method guarantees a 100% result. A lot depends on luck! Therefore, our method is based on minimizing risks. Especially if you are launching alone or with a small team. 📍 Our way of reducing risks consists of 3 points: 1️⃣ Launch a micro-product only for existing demand. The most accurate tool to c

👍196👎2

9 Apr 2024, 14:48 UTC≈4,690 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😈 In short, myth of Builder #1: «Why do it if it already exists?» We always create micro-products for existing demand in search. But why create a product if there is already something like it on the market?☝️ This is a very common question. I decided to answer in detail. Remember where we start? We look for existing demand in search. That is, we don't come up with an idea. Instead, we take numbers from real querie

13👍11

9 Apr 2024, 14:47 UTC≈4,450 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌋 In short, this channel is hosting a challenge to launch 12 projects in 12 months. I launch projects using the simplest scheme: 1️⃣ 1 week — finding an idea that meets existing demand 2️⃣ 1 week — development 3️⃣ 2 weeks — promotion We do only simple things according to this formula: 1 launch = 1 feature = solving 1 problem 🧲 This channel gathers the most talented people from the IT sphere. Here, we validate idea

👍3210🔥9👏4👨‍💻4🥰3👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @captain_works. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Captain Works” (@captain_works), 3,735 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/captain_works.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.