11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,727–4,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 07:15
4,794
+3
1 Sept 2026, 23:54
4,791
-10
30 Aug 2026, 06:14
4,801
+2
27 Aug 2026, 16:13
4,799
+15
24 Aug 2026, 17:54
4,784
-8
20 Aug 2026, 19:43
4,792
+5
17 Aug 2026, 18:05
4,787
+8
14 Aug 2026, 07:46
4,779
+36
11 Aug 2026, 02:07
4,743
+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:50
4,739
+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:48
4,737
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.82%
avg views ÷ 4,794 subscribers
Avg views / post
423
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
17 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
846
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
106 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
22
20.8%
❤
19
17.9%
🔥
18
17.0%
custom 5217767373464964531
13
12.3%
custom 5217466592610254563
11
10.4%
custom 5472255846589160816
9
8.49%
custom 5217483089579639160
5
4.72%
❤🔥
4
3.77%
custom 5397657027776373394
1
0.943%
⚡
1
0.943%
👏
1
0.943%
🤝
1
0.943%
🤣
1
0.943%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ChatGPT’dan foydalanamiz, lekin ba’zida uni noto‘g‘ri ishlatib qo‘yamiz 👀
Oddiygina savol berish — har doim ham eng yaxshi natija degani emas.
Bugungi karuselda ChatGPT bilan ishlaganda eng ko‘p uchraydigan 5 ta xatoni jamladik. Qaysi birini siz ham qilgansiz? 👇
Saqlab qo‘ying — keyingi safar ChatGPT’ga murojaat qilganingizda asqotadi
Siz ChatGPT’dan ko‘proq nima uchun foydalanasiz?
@canvora
canvora pinned «CANVORADA YANGI PRICELIST 🔴CapCut Pro 1 oylik — 75 000 so'm 🔴ChatGPT Plus Biznes | O'z akkauntingizga 1 oylik — 220 000 so'm 🔴ChatGPT Plus Shaxsiy 1 oylik — 190 000 so'm 🔴ChatGPT Plus Jamoa (6 kishi) 1 oylik — 75 000 so'm 🔴Claude Pro | Oʻz akkauntingizga…»
Kurs ishi yozish 3 haftaga cho'zilishi shart emas 📚
Ko'p talaba ChatGPT'ga "kurs ishi yozib ber" deb yozadi — va ishlatib bo'lmaydigan matn oladi. To'g'ri usul boshqacha: ishni 4 bosqichga bo'lish kerak.
1️⃣ Reja — avval tuzilma, keyin matn 2️⃣ Manba — haqiqiy, tekshirilgan havolalar 3️⃣ Matn — bo'lim-bo'lim, bir so'rovda emas 4️⃣ Tahrir — o'zingizga tanqidiy savollar berdiring
Har bosqich uchun tayyor promptlar k…
🎁 DO'STINGIZNI TAKLIF QILING — OBUNANI BEPUL OLING
Har bir do'stingiz uchun 25 000 so'm balans.
3 ta do'st = CapCut Pro 1 oy BEPUL 🔥
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Qanday ishlaydi?
1️⃣ Do'stingizga @canvora kanalini tavsiya qiling
2️⃣ U obuna sotib olayotganda sizning username'ingizni aytadi
3️⃣ To'lov o'tgach — hisobingizga 25 000 so'm qo'shiladi
Balansni CapCut obunasi uchun sarflaysiz. Muddati 1 oy davomida.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━…
"Plus'ga pul to'lashga arziydimi?" — eng ko'p beriladigan savol.
Qisqa javob: haftada bir-ikki marta ishlatsangiz — Free yetadi. Har kuni ishlatsangiz, Free eng kerakli paytda to'xtaydi.
Asosiy farqlar karuselda jadval ko'rinishida: limit, tezlik, modellar, rasm va fayl tahlili ➡️
Oddiy qoida: agar oyiga 10 soatdan ko'p vaqtingizni tejasa — Plus o'zini qoplaydi.
Canvora'da rasmiy Plus va Jamoa obunalarini ochamiz…
Gemini Ultra — sun’iy intellektning kuchli darajasi endi qo’lingizda
Google’ning eng top AI modeli — Gemini 3.1 Pro, Veo 3.1 video generatsiyasi, Nano Banana Pro va 2 million tokenli kontekst oynasi bilan.
Xarid uchun @canvora_adminga murojat qiling
@canvora
ChatGPT Plus orqali tezkor javoblar, ustuvor kirish va eng so’nggi imkoniyatlardan foydalanish mumkin. Xizmatimiz orqali original obuna bilan bir xil funksiyalarga ega bo’lasiz.
Murojat uchun: @canvora_admin
@canvora
canvora pinned «CANVORADA YANGI PRICELIST 🔴CapCut Pro 1 oylik — 75 000 so'm 🔴ChatGPT Plus Biznes | O'z akkauntingizga 1 oylik — 220 000 so'm 🔴ChatGPT Plus Shaxsiy 1 oylik — 190 000 so'm 🔴ChatGPT Plus Jamoa (6 kishi) 1 oylik — 75 000 so'm 🔴Claude Pro | Oʻz akkauntingizga…»
CANVORADA YANGI PRICELIST
🔴CapCut Pro
1 oylik — 75 000 so'm
🔴ChatGPT Plus Biznes | O'z akkauntingizga
1 oylik — 220 000 so'm
🔴ChatGPT Plus Shaxsiy
1 oylik — 190 000 so'm
🔴ChatGPT Plus Jamoa (6 kishi)
1 oylik — 75 000 so'm
🔴Claude Pro | Oʻz akkauntingizga
1 oylik — 230 000
🔴Gemini Pro (o'z akkauntingizga ulanadi)
1 oylik — 170 000 so'm
🔴Gemini Ultra (o'z akkauntingizga ulanadi)
1 oylik, 0 kredit — 500 000 so'm
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @canvora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@canvora named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@canvora_adminga named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“canvora” (@canvora), 4,794 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canvora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.