Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cancer Chameleon

Channel

Cancer Chameleon

@cancerchameleon

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,136subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001778596967
TypeChannel
Username@cancerchameleon
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cancerchameleon

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,1043,1363,1207 August 2026 — 3,104 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,104 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,105 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,106 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,104 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,108 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,110 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,105 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,104 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,109 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,110 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,136 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,099–3,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 18:593,136+26
12 Sept 2026, 16:193,110+1
8 Sept 2026, 10:423,109+5
2 Sept 2026, 19:183,104-1
30 Aug 2026, 10:143,105-5
27 Aug 2026, 02:013,110+2
23 Aug 2026, 17:543,108+4
19 Aug 2026, 23:443,104-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:243,106+1
13 Aug 2026, 04:343,105+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:013,104no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:523,104first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

686 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27940.7%
🔥21030.6%
❤‍🔥8712.7%
🤔294.23%
👍223.21%
213.06%
🤩142.04%
👌101.46%
😁60.875%
🤯40.583%
🆒20.292%
👏20.292%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 686 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 May 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,850 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю как вы, но я периодически задавался вопросом о причине редкости первичных опухолей в сердце или метастазов. Еще одна редкая локализация, где мы такое можем наблюдать - тонкая кишка, но там все относительно понятно (на самом деле нет, пока гипотезы). На глаза попалась статья в Science - https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads9412. Что препятствует образованию опухолевых клеток в сердце? Если кратко, то авторы пишу

48😁6👌2👍1

6 Feb 2026, 15:11 UTC≈3,640 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это слишком хорошо, чтобы быть правдой. Результаты клинического исследования 3-й фазы Lung TIME-C01 меня очень, мягко говоря, удивили и я не смог пройти мимо чтения статьи - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-04181-w. Корректировка времени введения Синтилимаба или Пембролизумаба может почти удвоить выживаемость пациентов с метастатическим немелкоклеточным раком легкого. У пациентов, получавших инфузии до 15

🔥28🤔1711🤯41🆒1

30 Jan 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,810 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

25 лет спустя. Вчера, обнаружил что в Cell вышла работа, которая подводит черту в многолетних наблюдениях Дугласа Ханахана. Профессор, окончательно закрепившийся в Лозанне и объединивший под своим началом ключевые швейцарские институты (ISREC, SCCL, Agora), представил, финальный кирпичик в своей концепции Hallmarks of Cancer: Then and Now, and Beyond. Я следил за эволюцией 2000, 2011 и 2022 годов, и могу сказать э

62🔥2313👍1

6 Jan 2026, 07:58 UTC≈3,200 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Январь 2023 <-> январь 2026 Три года назад Дэвид Римм и его команда опубликовала работу, где показала что согласованность патологов в определении HER2 экспрессии для карцином молочной железы по категории 1+ составила менее 1%, а решение «0 против не 0» фактически превратилось в подбрасывание монеты с уровнем согласия всего 59,4% (посмотрите графики воспроизводимости в комментариях). Это исследование добавило напряжен

🔥1910❤‍🔥2

17 Dec 2025, 12:21 UTC≈3,640 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎄Новогодняя неделя разборок😁 статей с авторами Уже в эту субботу начинаем читать свежие статьи вместе: 1️⃣ 20 декабря, 12:00 по МСК Продолжаем разбор лимфом и обсуждаем работу из Nature Genetics: 🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-025-02353-5 - прикрепил графический абстракт 2️⃣ 21 декабря (воскресенье), 12:00 по МСК Две статьи, посвящённые опухолям почек, обе — из Cell Reports Medicine: 🔗 https://www.cell

19🔥8❤‍🔥2👍1

18 Nov 2025, 07:57 UTC≈2,760 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ссылка для подключения - обсуждение лимфом

14 Nov 2025, 09:57 UTC≈3,560 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Во вторник в 11:00 мск созвон по лимфомам. Всем привет! мы встречаемся снова, в 18 ноября, это ближайший вторник и обсуждаем то, что в канале не часто звучит - лимфомы. За основу берем работу и разбираем, что она меняет в нашей картине мира. (а картиночка из https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2). Мы с вами знаем, что DLBCL не только GCB vs ABC подтипы через Hans алгоритм, но и набор мутаций. И знаем, что у оп

🔥3412❤‍🔥4

28 Sept 2025, 06:50 UTC≈3,040 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет🔥! Через 10 минут начинаем встречу с Иваном Валиевым, говорим про то, как опухоль использует нервы для роста и развития, опухолевую нейропластичность и многое другое. 🎙В этот раз пробуем Zoom (ссылка на встречу), надеюсь связь будет стабильной. Если нет, то перейдем на трансляцию в Телеграмм. Записи наших встреч можно будет найти по ссылке.

🔥5👏2❤‍🔥1

17 Sept 2025, 13:15 UTCviews —

Cancer Chameleon pinned «Планируем насыщенные выходные с двумя классными учёными и экспертами (и моими бывшими коллегами😏) из США и Франции - обсуждаем опухоли легкого🫁 1. 27.09, 16:00 МСК — разговор с Никитой Котловым (Sr.Director R&D, BostonGene, Бостон) Обсуждаем Peyraud et al.…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cancerchameleon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Онкология простыми словами
@oncolya · 27,282
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cancer Chameleon” (@cancerchameleon), 3,136 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cancerchameleon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.