Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Canal João de Athayde

Channel

Canal João de Athayde

@canaljoaodeathayde

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,765subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001356770739
TypeChannel
Username@canaljoaodeathayde
Created3 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/canaljoaodeathayde

Growth

1,7651,7721,768.57 August 2026 — 1,769 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,769 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,768 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,766 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,768 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,769 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,766 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,765 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,769 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,768 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,772 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,765 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 38 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,764–1,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 16:011,765-7
10 Sept 2026, 02:421,772+4
4 Sept 2026, 21:161,768-1
1 Sept 2026, 08:431,769+4
29 Aug 2026, 14:031,765-1
26 Aug 2026, 21:281,766-3
24 Aug 2026, 00:261,769+1
17 Aug 2026, 09:591,768+2
10 Aug 2026, 14:511,766-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:401,768-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:301,769no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:191,769first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

517 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍31761.3%
👏10420.1%
🔥479.09%
😁224.26%
214.06%
🤔50.967%
😱10.193%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2025 to 8 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Apr 2025, 09:26 UTC≈3,730 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Excelente artigo expondo a Anvisa e suas contradições. A Anvisa, assim como o Detran e o MEC são órgãos ditatoriais: o que seus tecnocratas decidem, tá decidido, não há conversa, não há apelo. https://open.substack.com/pub/samuelsena/p/ora-pro-nobis-e-proibido-pela-anvisa?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=14cz7a

👍47🔥84

2 Apr 2025, 22:30 UTC≈3,090 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Essencial, necessário, exclarecedor. Só que é em inglês. E o sotaque neo-zelandês dela é duro nos ouvidos. https://youtu.be/dMkyCn-QXWE?si=oKLpnOUERjdhUXBU

👏22👍32

30 Mar 2025, 13:33 UTC≈2,950 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Os Russos dizem que estão aptos a colaborar com Elon Musk na conquista de Marte 😅😅 A segunda metade do artigo é toda sobre a vontade russa de auxiliar na colonização de Marte, oferecendo uns reatores nucleares etc. E cheio de recentes elogios russos à Elon Musk. "A Rússia está preparada para contribuir com uma estação de energia nuclear compacta e “outras tecnologias avançadas” para apoiar uma missão a Marte planej

👍19😁14

19 Mar 2025, 19:46 UTC≈2,030 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Notícia da RT 17/03/25 Ué, o Putin não era o "grande nacionalista"? Agora abre para que - pela primeira vez na história - fundos de investimentos Americanos possam adquirir ações de importantes empresas russas? Certamente é parte do "acordo de paz". Putin é um engodo, melhorou um pouco a situação da Rússia quando chegou no poder só para ganhar crédito para poder dividir tranquilo o bolo para certos oligarcas e depo

👍35🔥8👏62😱1

19 Mar 2025, 10:43 UTC≈4,280 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

E vc aí, pobre tolinho inocente, hipnotizado pela Mírdia, achando que os gov.dos EUA, UK, Israel e etc. combatem os “radicais islâmicos”… “Um e-mail de 2012 publicado pelo Wikileaks do atual assessor de segurança nacional do governo Biden, Jake Sullivan, para a então secretária de Estado, Hillary Clinton, descreveu claramente a posição dos EUA em relação aos grupos terroristas islâmicos. Sullivan fez a surpreendente

👍20🔥8😁2

12 Mar 2025, 10:37 UTC≈1,690 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

3/3 - o exemplo da Corte Internacional de Haia @CanalJoaoDeAthayde

👍10👏101

12 Mar 2025, 10:34 UTC≈1,620 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

2/3 - continuação da análise da decisão do Tribunal de Justiça Europeu por João de Athayde

👍18👏1

12 Mar 2025, 10:23 UTC≈1,910 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

"Tribunal de Justiça Europeu diz que os únicos responsáveis pela vacinação são os Médicos e que estes podem ser processados juridicamente" 1/3- Análise por João Athayde

👍13👏10😁2

12 Mar 2025, 10:06 UTC≈1,620 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Segue análise em áudio abaixo:

👏13🤔4😁32

11 Mar 2025, 01:01 UTC≈1,450 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Trump ameaça a Rússia com mais sanções se ela não fizer um cessar fogo e até que o acordo de paz seja alcançado. E ainda tem gente que acha que Putin está por cima da carne seca. Embora a iniciativa da guerra foi da Rússia (ou melhor, da oligarco-cabala que a comanda), agora a Rússia perdeu totalmente a iniciativa, que está claramente com a cabala deste setor do Deep State Americano. Mais sanções seriam desastrosas

👍33

9 Mar 2025, 11:19 UTC≈1,390 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Como em TODOS os assuntos, quando nos aprofundamos, vemos que há enganação. Já sairam vários vídeos mostrando que NÃO EXISTEM TERRAS RARAS EXPLORÁVEIS NA UCRÂNIA. Pois é. Este é apenas um deles. Então, o que verdadeiramente EUA e Rússia estão negociando na Ucrânia, ainda não sabemos ao certo. Entre vários vídeos que abordam o assunto, escolhi este por que traz tb uma interessante revelação: os scanners aéreos 3D d

👍28👏7🔥31🤔1😁1

4 Mar 2025, 05:58 UTC≈1,400 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

A Estranha Amizade entre Putin e Kissinger. Texto de 4 páginas mencionado na Live de 25/02/25 « Trump Humilha Zelenski » no YT João de Athayde Novo Canal. https://www.youtube.com/live/xs1-3Sbj69w?si=M02Wep4lRxjtFzxB @CanalJoaoDeAthayde

7👍3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @canaljoaodeathayde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Canal João de Athayde” (@canaljoaodeathayde), 1,765 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canaljoaodeathayde.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.