Maior canal de reality shows e entretenimento do Telegram 🇧🇷
🎯 Ad/publi/suporte: @suporteatn
✉️ [email protected]
👁 Antene-se: linktr.ee/canalantenados
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -6,106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,395–63,385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 00:50
56,242
-99
6 Nov 2026, 23:29
56,341
-118
5 Nov 2026, 21:18
56,459
-102
4 Nov 2026, 22:40
56,561
-85
3 Nov 2026, 23:55
56,646
-100
3 Nov 2026, 00:37
56,746
-53
1 Nov 2026, 21:58
56,799
-111
31 Oct 2026, 22:34
56,910
-79
31 Oct 2026, 00:10
56,989
-116
30 Oct 2026, 02:51
57,105
-122
28 Oct 2026, 23:18
57,227
-123
28 Oct 2026, 00:19
57,350
-80
27 Oct 2026, 01:58
57,430
-117
26 Oct 2026, 04:40
57,547
-109
25 Oct 2026, 02:55
57,656
-84
24 Oct 2026, 05:00
57,740
-137
23 Oct 2026, 01:40
57,877
-110
22 Oct 2026, 01:45
57,987
-148
20 Oct 2026, 23:05
58,135
-90
19 Oct 2026, 21:17
58,225
first reading
Engagement
1,979 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.727%
avg views ÷ 56,242 subscribers
Avg views / post
409
972 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
973
of 1,979 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 881 of 972 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
1,979 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
397,399
Reactions total
14,352
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈171,000
Videos
≈2,810
Links
≈4,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 46m
Average length
1m 45s
Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,754 reactions across 895 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤮
4,140
28.1%
😁
3,959
26.8%
❤
1,956
13.3%
👏
1,060
7.18%
🤡
670
4.54%
🔥
567
3.84%
👍
339
2.30%
😢
333
2.26%
🥱
311
2.11%
🤬
310
2.10%
🎉
198
1.34%
😱
181
1.23%
🏆
162
1.10%
💩
142
0.962%
🥴
114
0.773%
🖕
96
0.651%
🎄
58
0.393%
🌚
53
0.359%
🙏
38
0.258%
😈
17
0.115%
8 further kinds
50
0.339%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 904 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,754 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 October 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 999 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @canalantenados. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 October 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
797
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
409
over 998 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 October 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 43 of 973 posts held from the last 30 days (4.42%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Daniel saiu da academia pouco tempo depois de dizer que votaria em Sérgio para proteger seu grupo. Em seguida, os peões repercutiram a fala.
Fran: "O Daniel ainda vai defender o Serginho."
Murilo: "Ele já defendeu, mas ele sabe que quando apertar, ele vai ter que escolher. Quando o dele estiver na reta, que não tá muito longe também... Mas isso é questão de jogo. Vai acontecer e ele vai ter que fazer. A gente não v…
👀 Daniel: "Com tantas pessoas na casa, eu não me sentiria à vontade de votar no Serginho agora, mas só se for pra gente se proteger mesmo."
Murilo: "É proteção e ataque. Pingou voto? Vamos em cima."
Daniel: "Não tá jogando com a gente, não tem o que fazer. Talvez ele vote em mim pra proteger quem tá do lado dele."
Murilo: "Ele vota, sim. Não duvide, não."
Daniel: "Não duvido, não."
⭐ Não perca a programação da Li…
Lucas disse que Giovanna acertou quando comentou sobre "psicoterrorismo" no jogo, pois é o que ele tem sofrido com Tina.
Lucas: "Isso é psicoterrorismo, cara! Ficar gritando isso no meu ouvido o tempo todo? Isso é chato, cara."
Ariela: "Ignora!"
Ana Bruna: "Ele tava parado. Ele nem se alterou."
Lucas: "Os dois grupos vieram falar comigo sobre jogo solo e eu falei que prefiro, porque tenho liberdade. Eu tenho cari…
👀 Murilo disse que Rikardo poderia estar no jogo se tivesse escolhido outra rota na votação anterior.
Murilo: "Não dá mais pra vacilar! Era pro Rikardo estar aqui hoje se tivesse voltado no Alfredo."
Daniel: "Alfredo sairia?"
Murilo: "Não, mas Rikardo estaria aqui."
Daniel: "Quem sairia?"
Murilo: "A Duda. Certeza."
Fran: "A Duda não iria, mas iria Serginho, eu acho."
Murilo: "Renata, Alfredo, Sérgio e o Resta …
🔥 BRUNO QUESTIONA ESPECIALISTA SOBRE OS TRAUMAS DE ANA BRUNA!
Durante a análise do jogo, Bruno quis saber a fundo como Ana Bruna pode lidar com suas questões emocionais e traumas que acabam pesando diretamente na convivência e na relação com Serginho. O apresentador questionou a analista comportamental Lailah para entender se existe saída para esses padrões de comportamento dentro do confinamento.
⭐️ Acompanhe a Li…
Ana Bruna diz que Lucas nunca pediu nada para ela em relação ao jogo.
Darlin: "Agora eu entendo tudo. Por isso o Mayk ficou tão nervoso comigo ontem, porque eu ressaltei as qualidades do Lucas."
Ana Bruna: "Eles querem criar uma coisa e querem enfiar na nossa cara. Quando a gente diz 'não' é o fim do mundo. Me usando o quê? Eu que chamei ele pra deitar comigo, eu que chamei ele pra conversar. Ele nunca me pediu nad…
Darlin: "Acho que eles querem botar você, Bissoli, eu e mais um. Eles querem fazer isso!"
Ana Bruna: "Se tem uma coisa que sou boa é de probabilidade de Roça. Acho que o Mayk vai no Lucas. A maioria dos votos vai acabar sendo no Thaíde, porque Duda e Alfredo não vão abrir mão do voto no Thaíde, porque acham que ele sai. Maíra e Ariela não vão na gente, então eles não conseguem colocar eu e você."
Darlin: "Mas acho …
🔥 Ana Bruna disse que não será controlada por Tina nem ninguém.
Ana Bruna: "As pessoas não tão acostumadas com essa Ana. Tão acostumadas com a Ana que vai falar 'Vou largar ele e nós vamos ser amigas para sempre'. Nunca foi sobre ele! É sobre querer me controlar. A partir do momento que eu disse não, foi o fim do mundo. Eu tava sentada na fogueira, ela veio e falou que o jantar tava pronto. Eu subi 10 minutos depois…
🔥 GABI JOGA A REAL SOBRE ANA BRUNA: "CAI NO JOGO QUANDO ESTÁ COM UM HOMEM!"
O jogo de #AFazenda 18 está rendendo análises afiadas! Gabi não teve papas na língua ao detonar o comportamento de Ana Bruna na Sede, apontando que a peoa perde o foco e despenca no jogo sempre que se envolve com algum homem. Para você, Gabi acertou ou errou?
⭐️ Acompanhe a Link TV: lives às 10h, 14h, 17h30 e 20h no YouTube. 📺 Inscreva-se: …
🔥 Ana Bruna quis entender o que Tina tem de tão forte contra Lucas. A peoa não gostou.
Ana Bruna: "Se eu me envolvesse com Erthal, não teria esse problema."
Tina: "Ele é meu alvo, mas não como o Lucas."
Ana Bruna: "Mas o que o Lucas te fez?"
Tina: "Você jogou comigo ou não jogou?"
Ana Bruna: "Lucas é pior que Erthal? Você consegue ficar de boa com o Erthal."
Tina: "Eu consigo conviver com todo mundo."
Ana Brun…
🔥 Ana Bruna: "Por que o Sérgio, depois de fazer o que fez contigo e comigo, se senta na mesa com você?"
Tina: "Eu não me relaciono com ele e nem com você. Você tá trazendo situações diferentes."
Ana Bruna: "Eu quero botar na mesma balança pra entender."
Tina: "Qual foi o dia que me deitei com Sérgio? Qual dia andei com ele pra cima e pra baixo com um short dele?"
Ana Bruna: "Você deitou com ele."
Tina: "Eu não b…
😁13🤮3
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,979 posts we hold for @canalantenados. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 16 posts on @canalantenados as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
34 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 October 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@canalantenados named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@broadinstitute named in 3 posts, 28 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
@ionis_pharma named in 3 posts, 28 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
@mayoclinic named in 3 posts, 28 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Canal Antenados - A Fazenda 18” (@canalantenados), 56,242 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/canalantenados.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.