Selling nft creator bot for $1000 Easily make 1000+ nfts a day Selling nft collection All 10000 before they even listed easily sell each for $15 150k profit Selling the collection for $2500
Channel
Campaigns
@campaignsof2021
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001681172682 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @campaignsof2021 |
| Created | 25 November 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/campaignsof2021 |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 3 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 25 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝘽𝙀𝙎𝙏 𝙐𝙋𝘾𝙊𝙈𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝙈𝙀𝙂𝘼 𝙊𝙉 𝙏𝙀𝙇𝙀𝙂𝙍𝘼𝙈 🦑📲 5K+ FEED https://t.me/+POR6HwduLw0wMWRk 15K+ LIVE (NEW MEGA CONCEPT) https://t.me/+zw0b4JXXa61kOTg0 DM BOT MEGA (5K+) https://t.me/litmega PRIVATE TIK TOK 10K+ MEGA (PM @ZingerboxKFC to join)
First 10 will be this price then it will be $200 per spot
50 spots
$150 100k guaranteed 250k+ expected
I cancelled all giveaways and refunded all spots We have a much better giveaway growth campaign
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @campaignsof2021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@campaignsof2021 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Campaigns” (@campaignsof2021), 3 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/campaignsof2021.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.