Channel
@calls_ofduty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001991112273 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @calls_ofduty |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/calls_ofduty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 30 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 31 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 11 | 68.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2024 to 26 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$SHEGEN The first female AI with daddy issues. Smashing boundaries, corrupting minds. 2KgAN8nLAU74wjiyKi85m4ZT6Z9MtqrUTGfse8Xapump currently 17M ,a good potential AI to join 100M club , DYOR.
🔥2❤1
BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Donald Trump officially elected President of the United States of America. @WatcherGuru
$dorime looks good for a 2-3x here, check out this https://t.me/dorimecoinsol
2x in $TODD from dip
todd Buy! 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 🔀 Spent $99.91 (0.686 SOL) 🔀 Got 43,632 todd 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 Position +4% 💸 Market Cap $2,266,799 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
👍1
Aped more $TODD at this dip. 1M now!
🔥3
$TODD at 1.5M CA - CK7UwtyYTo4CmBohCF9RhF6mCNDxnLMcZsCqouP9pump 2 days old project! Distro is great Community is working. This might do well. Tg https://t.me/+TzU39hoi9mpmOGI1 #DYOR
🔥2👍1
160k! CHART IS PRIMED
We only called like 15 tokens in the last 8 months. We always believe quality over quantity. All of them were bangers and huge mcap tokens.
🔥1
Calls of duty pinned «SUMMARY SO FAR $BENDOG called at 2.8M, ATH 78M - 28X $EPEP called at 6M, ATH 35M - 6X $BOMO called at 15M, ATH 70M - 4.2X $GIGA called at 16M, CURRENTLY AT ATH 500M - 32X $GOAT called at 6M, ATH 24M - 4X $SLERF called at 311M, ATH 734M - 2X $JEWS called…»
SUMMARY SO FAR $BENDOG called at 2.8M, ATH 78M - 28X $EPEP called at 6M, ATH 35M - 6X $BOMO called at 15M, ATH 70M - 4.2X $GIGA called at 16M, CURRENTLY AT ATH 500M - 32X $GOAT called at 6M, ATH 24M - 4X $SLERF called at 311M, ATH 734M - 2X $JEWS called at 2M DIP, went 6.7M - 3.5X $TRUMP called at 400k dip, went 7M - 18X $NOHAT called at 800k, went 22M - 28X $SEAT called at 2.6M dip, failed ❌ $ROCKY called…
🔥1
Solid 2x from our entry. Cult is forming. This will run
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @calls_ofduty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@calls_ofduty named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Calls of duty” (@calls_ofduty), 30 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/calls_ofduty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.