Channel name was changed to «Xavier»

Channel
Xavier
@callmedaddybruh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
+75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002228158247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @callmedaddybruh |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/callmedaddybruh |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 121 | +33 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 88 | +45 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 43 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 42 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 44 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 46 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 46 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 21 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 30s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368598511707254517 | 16 | 20.8% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 20.8% | |
| custom 5276294450425902729 | 11 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5368648792889386833 | 8 | 10.4% | |
| custom 6188206545277291962 | 7 | 9.09% | |
| custom 6131918877149370880 | 4 | 5.19% | |
| custom 5456299987249946754 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.30% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
contact @iamronnyheree , Price negotiable
❤1
t.me/nft/IceCream-51229
❤1
t.me/nft/SnoopDogg-526364
❤2
t.me/nft/JesterHat-64225
❤1
nft For sell Contact @iamronnyheree to buy
t.me/nft/MousseCake-86694
Video, posted without a caption
🔥5custom 52762944504259027292custom 53685985117072545172❤1custom 61319188771493708801
https://t.me/Vogue_english_chat
custom 53686487928893868333❤2🔥1🥰1custom 52762944504259027291custom 53685985117072545171custom 61319188771493708801
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2custom 53685985117072545172👍1custom 52762944504259027291custom 53686487928893868331custom 61319188771493708801
Video, posted without a caption
🔥2custom 52762944504259027292custom 53685985117072545172custom 61882065452772919622❤1
Video, posted without a caption
custom 54562999872499467543❤2custom 52762944504259027291custom 53685985117072545171custom 61882065452772919621
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @callmedaddybruh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xavier” (@callmedaddybruh), 121 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/callmedaddybruh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.