Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Маркетинг по-человечески

@callibri

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,991subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001112127804
TypeChannel
Username@callibri
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/callibri

Growth

3,9914,0063,998.56 August 2026 — 4,006 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,004 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,002 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,991 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,989–4,008 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:583,991-11
10 Aug 2026, 06:384,002-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:054,004-2
6 Aug 2026, 06:064,006first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 3,991 subscribers
Avg views / post
539
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (26 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,234
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4258.3%
👍1419.4%
🔥1216.7%
❤‍🔥22.78%
👎11.39%
💯11.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC145 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

2🔥2👍1👎1

3 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC376 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Три новости маркетинга, которые заставят проверить резюме, скрипты продаж и клиентский сервис 💛 Поздравляем, мы работаем в самой конкурентной сфере 🥲 Если планировали менять работу — не меняйте запаситесь терпением. По данным hh.ru, в маркетинге и рекламе сейчас на одну вакансию приходится 26 резюме — конкурс даже больше, чем в ИТ. Чтобы выделиться среди кандидатов, нужно уметь продвигать бренд, разрабатывать марке

👍43🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC492 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если вы не Apple и не Hermès, этот пост для вас В отличие от люкса и известных брендов, большинству компании приходится постоянно думать, как покупатели отреагируют на изменение цены. Например, если повысить её на 10%, спрос может: 💛 Упасть. Клиенты просто уйдут к конкурентам или найдут более дешёвую альтернативу. 💛 Сохраниться. От жизненно важных товаров вроде инсулина отказаться не получится — люди продолжат их

3👍2

29 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC691 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Где все лиды в медицине? Провели исследование и узнали Мы проанализировали 255 181 обращение из 483 клиник по всей России за первое полугодие 2026 года. Посмотрели: — Какие каналы связи выбирают пациенты. — Откуда приходят обращения. — Как меняется стоимость лида. — Какие источники трафика приводят больше всего пациентов. Делимся результатами с вами. В карточках — основные цифры, а в статье — выводы и рекомендац

3👍2🔥2

24 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC947 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новые ограничения для работы с самозанятыми 🟡 Привет, это Аня Бессмертная, юрист Callibri и эксперт IT's LEGAL. Хочу обсудить с вами новость: С 1 октября 2026 года для работы с самозанятыми и ИП через цифровые платформы появится новое ограничение. Если один исполнитель выполняет заказы одного и того же заказчика более 60 часов в месяц на протяжении 6 месяцев подряд, платформа должна ограничить такое взаимодействие.

5🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC583 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что за «Маркетинг по-человечески» такой 💛 Это канал Callibri — сервисов автоматизации работы с лидами на всех этапах воронки. Его мы ведём для вас — маркетологов, предпринимателей и агентств. Тут вы найдёте: • исследования, • кейсы и статьи о новых инструментах и подходах, • анонсы мероприятий, • разборы новостей и законов, которые влияют на нашу отрасль. В канале рассказываем коротко о главном, а в блоге публикуе

6❤‍🔥2👍1💯1🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC664 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Две полезные встречи в июле 🟡 Привет, на связи Надя Белезина — я отвечаю за мероприятия в Колибри. Наши эксперты делятся опытом, практическими инструментами, кейсами и исследованиями в сфере маркетинга и диджитал. Приглашаю вас на две классные конференции в июле. Бесплатно, но с регистрацией. 📍 Маркетинг в Максе 📅 Сегодня, 14 июля, вторник 🕑 14:00–16:00 МСК 💻 Онлайн, запись будет Обсудим, зачем быть в новом мессен

5🔥2👍1

10 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,260 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ИИ-контент будут маркировать: что это меняет 🟡 Привет, я Аня Бессмертная, юрист Callibri и эксперт IT's LEGAL. Я к вам с новостью: Госдума приняла закон о поддержке развития искусственного интеллекта сразу во втором и третьем чтениях. Он вступит в силу с 1 сентября 2026 года, а отдельные положения начнут действовать с 1 марта 2027 года. Это пока рамочный закон, который задаёт общие принципы. Конкретные правила раб

5👍1🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,720 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨ Вау, 20 000 просмотров ✨ Или всего лишь 20 000 просмотров? 🤔 Мы радуемся большим красивым цифрам — и это нормально. Но по одной метрике сложно сказать, работает ли контент. Те же 20 000 просмотров могут быть отличным результатом для публикации, если цель — привлечь внимание или повысить узнаваемость. А если хочется вовлечь аудиторию или получить заявки, то нужно учитывать и другие метрики. Нам стало интересно,

10👍2🔥1

Signed Светлана Скорицкая • Копирайтер

26 Jun 2026, 06:02 UTC≈799 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Да, конечно. Вот ваш собранный дайджест — дружелюбный и в стиле Callibri В этом канале вы не увидите такого вступления к новостным подборкам, потому что их пишет не ChatGPT, а редакция вручную. Итак, 3 новости за неделю: 💛 Яндекс открыл публичный доступ к сервису Vibecraft, который за 5–10 минут собирает сайт по вбитому промпту. ИИ‑помощник задаёт вопросы → вы с ним общаетесь → он генерирует страницы в реальном вр

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @callibri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 6,462 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маркетинг по-человечески” (@callibri), 3,991 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/callibri.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.