Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for .. ▷ @ calanthic : always buka yach

Channel

.. ▷ @ calanthic : always buka yach

@calanthic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

312subscribers

+169 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003938761632
TypeChannel
Username@calanthic
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 7 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/calanthic

Growth

14231222710 August 2026 — 143 subscribers10 August 2026 — 143 subscribers11 August 2026 — 142 subscribers18 August 2026 — 148 subscribers25 August 2026 — 312 subscribers10 August 202625 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +169. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 00:06312+164
18 Aug 2026, 08:44148+6
11 Aug 2026, 08:35142-1
10 Aug 2026, 12:00143no change
10 Aug 2026, 11:46143first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.71%
avg views ÷ 312 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.7
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total294
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC4 viewsread 10 August 2026

greget bgt ih sm yg ngeburu buru in padahal sebelum tf aja ngga nanya dulu bs cepet apa ngga 😔😔😔

10 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC7 viewsread 10 August 2026

kirim format garansi = udah baca rules ya guys. kalo aku sampein ke admin webnya, terus ternyata ada salah satu rulesnya ngga sesuai berarti garansi hangus & ngga bisa dipake lagi.

9 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026

oiyaa kalo ngerasa ada yg turun langsung send form garansi aja yaa, jangan lupa buat baca rulesnyaa jugaa! https://t.me/boostbycalma/92

9 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026

masih yaa guyss, berakhir di jam 23.59 pokoknyaa jgn sampe ketinggalaannn 🤗🤗🤗

9 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC4 viewsread 10 August 2026

openn guyss, kalo mau order sung chat @CALMUY / @meunteribot yaa! kalo mau chat ke whatsapp juga bolehh 081574764299 (salma) testiemoni & rnk ada di @riwoayat yach 🥰 mau klaim garansi? baca rules & isi form disini (https://t.me/boostbycalma/92)

9 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026

ada yg maw gk 350 folls ig luar 5k? cuma 1 slot aja enih, ngabisin saldo di webnya xixixi 😂✌🏻 sung chat @meunteri aja

9 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC16 viewsread 10 August 2026

guys kalo ngerasa ada yg turun langsung send form garansi aja yaa, jangan lupa buat baca rulesnyaa jugaa! https://t.me/boostbycalma/92

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @calanthic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 169,647 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“.. ▷ @ calanthic : always buka yach” (@calanthic), 312 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/calanthic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.