Channel
@caitongrj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
213subscribers
-569 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002953915019 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caitongrj |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caitongrj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 213 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:06 | 216 | -123 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 339 | -81 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 420 | -175 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 595 | -185 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 780 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 780 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 782 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 15 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
479名涉嫌网络诈骗的中国公民被柬埔寨王国遣返 2026年6月5日至6日，根据副首相兼内政部长阁下、内政部长阁下及内政部领导的高层建议，移民局局长索维斯纳中将指示调查执法局与中国驻柬埔寨大使馆合作，将479名涉嫌网络诈骗、非法居留和工作的中国公民（其中16名为女性）遣返出境。其中，306名中国公民（其中7名为女性）在暹粒吴哥国际机场门岗警察局乘坐专机被遣返，另有173名中国公民（其中9名为女性）在德乔国际机场门岗警察局乘坐专机被遣返。 驱逐上述外国人符合柬埔寨王国首相洪玛奈阁下为清除和消除柬埔寨王国境内发生的一切网络犯罪而采取的严格法律措施，以及副首相兼内政部长萨尔索卡博士阁下的强力指导，旨在确保本地区乃至全世界公民的安全，特别是打击网络犯罪的幕后主使，并解救被诱骗参与网络犯罪的受害者，使他们能够自由返回各自的国家。 🔔 关注大事件频道➡️ @caitongrj 🔔 关注斯里兰卡大事件频道➡️@LK878 🔔 关注吃瓜频…
#群友投稿：在园区打飞机是解决性欲成本最低的方式 你不打飞机你就得通过恋爱、约炮、或者嫖娼去解决你的性欲。但是身在园区的我们没有这么多时间去搞这些，这三者无论是从时间、精神、或金钱层面去看，成本都远远高于打飞机。 ps：打飞机是老一辈的祖传手艺 不能丢 🉐发扬光大。 🔔 关注大事件频道➡️ @caitongrj 🔔 关注斯里兰卡大事件频道➡️@LK878 🔔 关注吃瓜频道➡️@chigua8823 ✅投稿澄清爆料： @yg916 👑商务合作：@yg916
#网友爆料：2025年12月，林耀北在波呗的路上策划了把我绑进新城7园区的公司，由于今年柬埔寨国家政策原因准备打击电诈，2月14日他把人带出来准备带去别的地方发展。 我找准机会逃走，被他们拿着铁棍和其他工具殴打，幸亏当地善良的人救了我，要不然现在已经成为一具尸体。 公司总监林耀北，在公司拉帮结伙控制公司资源，为了自己的利益，开会让所有的管理把客户攥在自己的手里，作为他去跟别人谈判的筹码，他这种吃着别人的饭准备砸别人碗的行为就是卑鄙的小人，他把我绑进园区，我找机会跑了出来。 现在曝光他开客户，文某，2026年1月，湖北武汉，被骗1543000，郁XX，2026年1月，江苏扬州被骗54万……我手里还有他们入金的记录，随后曝光所有管理的照片和诈骗金额 🔔 关注大事件频道➡️ @caitongrj 🔔 关注斯里兰卡大事件频道➡️@LK878 🔔 关注吃瓜频道➡️@chigua8823 ✅投稿澄清爆料： @yg916 👑商务合作…
柬埔寨｜明日除夕至：有人留下，有人只想回家 明天（2月16 日）就是中国除夕。虽然春节不是柬埔寨法定节日，但不少机关和企业都会放假，华人与当地民众一同迎接新春。 在金边开拉面馆28年的老火，赶在除夕前夕飞回中国。临行前，他与二十多名柬籍员工聚餐，并发放印有生肖图案的红包。“母亲快九十岁了，今年一定要回家陪她过年。” 他说，哪怕常年在外打拼，团圆始终是刻在骨子里的牵挂。 也有人选择留下。已在柬埔寨生活多年的燕窝（化名）先生，一早前往金边乌亚西市场采购年货。灯笼、中国结、春联、祭祀用品一应俱全，年味浓郁。 有人归心似箭，有人守着异乡烟火。 这个春节，在柬华人的故事，各有温度。 🔔 关注大事件频道➡️ @caitongrj 🔔 关注斯里兰卡大事件频道➡️@LK878 🔔 关注吃瓜频道➡️@chigua8823 ✅投稿澄清爆料： @yg916 👑商务合作：@yg916
#网友提醒：前往波贝的兄弟请注意 目前多个路口实行24小时查车，重点检查车内是否有外国人以及是否携带手机、电脑等设备。即使是持有护照的外国人，现在也必须出示波贝的营业执照才允许进入。 当地正在严防诈骗人员进入，检查非常严格。局势比较紧张，大家注意。 🔔 关注大事件频道➡️ @caitongrj 🔔 关注斯里兰卡大事件频道➡️@LK878 🔔 关注吃瓜频道➡️@chigua8823 ✅投稿澄清爆料： @yg916 👑商务合作：@yg916
#网友爆料：2月10日凌晨12点，本集团鸿泰集团于4月10日8点从八号园区三期C310撤离，搬往波贝的路上被宪兵队抓获，同批抓获的还有其他五个盘口，均为一个集团旗下分公司！ 2月11日下午3点到达旧机场集中营，截到目前为止2月15日凌晨2点，没有给过一分钱生活费，封口费，安家费，有业绩的组员也不给，所有管理层，总监全部都在集中营关着。 其他五家盘口，被抓到集中营后均有积极参与营救，给予各个员工生活费，以及封口费和安家费。 鸿泰集团最大股东刘德华外号华哥，不旦一分钱生活费不给兄弟们，封口费安家费也没有，辛辛苦苦干了十个月什么也没拿到，业绩累计有两千多万，盘口总监，管理，员工，工资拖欠上百万。 这人住在金边别墅区瘦瘦带眼镜.江西人。 外号刘德华，人称华哥，出门带三个保镖-- 另外盘口股东林得发外号杰哥，阿冰外号冰哥，全部是心黑之人 （林得发杰哥福建泉州人） 请各大盘口老板擦亮眼睛，不要与此人进行合作，避免被坑！！！ 再…
#网友爆料：戈公省政府向外国人收取 100 美元，用于办理过境文件，例如护照等 ps：俗话就是检查点收取过路费 🔔 关注大事件频道➡️ @caitongrj 🔔 关注斯里兰卡大事件频道➡️@LK878 🔔 关注吃瓜频道➡️@chigua8823 ✅投稿澄清爆料： @yg916 👑商务合作：@yg916
#网友爆料：昨天晚上波贝发生了一起诈骗集团绑架未成年的恶性案件。 这名未成年人此前已经让家中筹钱给完2万美金赔付，本打算前往中国大使馆说明情况并回国投案自首，但所属公司和代理仍拒绝放人。 今天家属联系车辆接离时，几名中国人将柬埔寨司机拦截，随后代理 龙浩轩 指使诈骗集团人员将孩子强行扣押上车，并威胁任何司机不得再接人。 涉事诈骗集团为 乐鑫集团（位于 麒麟园区 3号） 孩子的父亲在国内已经报警，每天以泪洗面，整夜睡不着，只盼孩子平安回家、接受法律处理。 孩子也愿意面对责任，主动回国投案， 如今却被强行控制人身自由，这已不仅是简单的诈骗和非法拘禁了更是在如此形势下继续顶风干着跨境贩卖人口和绑架未成年的行径，简直无法无天、丧心病狂、罪恶滔天！ 家属放话只要该受害者平安到大使馆一定将所有知道的信息证据包括不限于：代理身份信息家庭住址和该诈骗集团数名核心成员面部照片及所在窝点视频等证据全部交予中国警方。 恳请中国大使馆及社…
❤1
#网友投稿：刚刚金边雅居乐很多宪兵队来查房 🔔 关注大事件频道➡️ @caitongrj 🔔 关注斯里兰卡大事件频道➡️@LK878 🔔 关注吃瓜频道➡️@chigua8823 ✅投稿澄清爆料： @yg916 👑商务合作：@yg916
跨国AI“杀猪盘”崩塌 夫妻在柬埔寨用Deepfake诈骗830万美元 韩国蔚山地方检察厅2月14日通报，一个盘踞柬埔寨、利用Deepfake（深度伪造）技术实施“杀猪盘”诈骗的跨国团伙被瓦解。 33岁的姜某及其妻子安某为骨干成员，在柬埔寨落网后曾两度获释，最终被押解回韩国受审。检方称，该团伙由中国籍金主出资，在柬埔寨设立多个据点，通过AI换脸打造“完美恋人”人设，诱导受害者下载虚假投资App实施诈骗。 案件涉及104名受害者，涉案金额约120亿韩元（约830万美元）。 团伙内部管理严苛，成员被迫长时间工作，业绩不达标者甚至遭禁闭。 目前，韩国警方已对主谋金某等26人申请国际刑警组织红色通缉，并启动赃款追缴程序。此案被视为AI技术被滥用于跨境诈骗的典型案例。 #斯里兰卡 #斯里兰卡大事件 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😍点击订阅斯里兰卡大事件 ✅点击加入 「斯里兰卡交流群」 ✅投稿澄清爆料： @yg916 👑商务合作：…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @caitongrj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@caitongrj named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“财通日记|柬埔寨大事件” (@caitongrj), 213 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caitongrj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.