for the mean time, dito ako mag u-update @sieyyshop try na'tin baka pag gc na hindi na ma banned haha pero paiyak na'ko sadya
Signed sieyy <3 | @sieyyshop : new channel.

Channel
@caincentives
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
47subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001239801130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caincentives |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caincentives |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 47 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 48 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 48 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 20 April 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| π₯° | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2022 to 8 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
for the mean time, dito ako mag u-update @sieyyshop try na'tin baka pag gc na hindi na ma banned haha pero paiyak na'ko sadya
Signed sieyy <3 | @sieyyshop : new channel.
. julyy 28, 2023 drop your points here. usn + points incentive chart. daily incentive ranking.
Signed sieyy <3 | closed.
Sa interested sumali sa incentives? Must join here po for updates, for updates : β’ @CAupdateszx for dropping of points : β’ @caincentives for pricelists : β’ @CApricelist for rules : β’ @caruless for unlocks β’ @caunlocks β comment your username plus screenshots of proof na nag join sa channels. β for other informations for incentives, click here.
Signed sieyy <3 | closed.
Congratsss pooo! This incentives (@caincentives) is just a token of appreciation kasi lab niyo ko as supplier niyo so desurb niyo tooo! Lablotss! π₯°π π» Top 1: @samieeey - 2,389pts - β±200 Top 2: @Trixcel - 1,278pts - β±100 Top 3: @dreewwee - 1,144pts - β±50 Gusto mong sumali sa incentives? Join here lang poo @CAupdateszx, @caincentives, @CApricelist and idrop mo po every day ang points mo para ma countt koo for more qβ¦
β€βπ₯2π₯°1
Signed sieyy <3 | closed.
Congratsss pooo! This incentives (@caincentives) is just a token of appreciation kasi lab niyo ko as supplier niyo so desurb niyo tooo! Lablotss! π₯°π π» Top 1 : @samieeey Top 2 : @herskiesx Top 3 : @elthegreatvyeah Top 4 : @marstheplanet Top 5 : @MsAndreaa Gusto mong sumali sa incentives? Join here lang poo @CAupdateszx, @caincentives, @CApricelist and idrop mo po every day ang points mo para ma countt koo for more β¦
β€1
Signed sieyy <3 | open.
sentt na po ang prices ng ating top 5 resellerss, more bentaaa to comeee! π₯³β€ top one :: 200 gcash/load @aacjaxace - 219pts top two :: 150 gcash/load @siriloveme - 183pts top three :: 100 gcash/load @herskiesx - 177pts top four :: 70 gcash/load @Chim_chimmy18 - 110pts top five :: 50 gcash/load @blockgcar - 47pts
β€1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @caincentives. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 560,977 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@caincentives named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββ°... ππ'π ππ»π°π²π»ππΆππ²πβ (@caincentives), 47 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caincentives.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.