Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cahiers sur l'anarchisme

Channel

Cahiers sur l'anarchisme

@cahiers_sur_lanarchisme

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

137subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002296438706
TypeChannel
Username@cahiers_sur_lanarchisme
Created23 December 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/cahiers_sur_lanarchisme

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1371391387 August 2026 — 139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 139 subscribers20 August 2026 — 137 subscribers28 August 2026 — 138 subscribers3 October 2026 — 137 subscribers7 August 20263 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 57 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Oct 2026, 21:19137-1
28 Aug 2026, 06:44138+1
20 Aug 2026, 12:52137-2
8 Aug 2026, 22:31139no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:26139first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 23 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3587.5%
🕊512.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2024 to 16 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jan 2025, 14:02 UTC328 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Равенство и свобода кажутся противоречащими друг другу ценностями в том случае, если первое преподносится как условие, предохраняющее от непредсказуемых последствий, а второе — как условие, угрожающее непредсказуемостью. Защищая социально-экономическое равенство возможностей и результатов, социалистические теоретики вынуждены говорить о свободе, как о продукте равенства, а не условии его достижения. Под свободой пон…

🕊4❤2

9 Jan 2025, 19:06 UTC370 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если одной из ключевых политических проблем является конституционная эффективность, т.е. степень, в которой публичные договоры могут быть реализованы и в какой они исполняются на деле, то необходимо посмотреть на структурные механизмы, обуславливающие перспективы соблюдения правительствами и частными агентами контрактов, заключенных с их «клиентами». Либертарианский экономист Питер Т. Лисон в очерке Government, Clubs…

❤4

29 Dec 2024, 13:06 UTC≈6,480 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Левые философы, развивающие раннюю «гуманистическую» мысль Маркса, стараются обнаружить корреляты между марксистским и феноменологически-экзистенциальным пониманием отчуждения и создать цельную объяснительную модель чувственной жизни при позднем капитализме. Мне кажется, что подобный синтез требует пересмотра данного Марксом определения, достигнутого путем серьезной редукции психологических мотиваций к труду. Для это…

❤8🕊1

25 Dec 2024, 19:15 UTC264 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Стоит сделать еще небольшое дополнение к обсуждению анархистского (либертарианского) классового анализа. Производя различение между экономическими средствами самопроявления и политическими, он помогает нам увидеть в современности богатую оттенками картину, палитра которой состоит из самоорганизующихся «множеств», находящихся под постоянным давлением государственных институтов. Классики рыночного анархизма, вроде Годс…

❤7

24 Dec 2024, 07:38 UTC793 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Соревнуясь в сложных описаниях симбиотических отношений правящих классов, радикальные теории редко видят в самой повседневности угнетённых что-либо ценное. Значительное пространство социологических размышлений отводится описанию последствий действий эксплуататоров и процессу подчинения новым реалиям. Но само богатство жизни, скрытое в позитивных повседневных взаимодействиях, помогает нам смягчать эффекты социальной д…

❤14

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @cahiers_sur_lanarchisme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cahiers sur l'anarchisme” (@cahiers_sur_lanarchisme), 137 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cahiers_sur_lanarchisme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.