Channel
@cafoundationstudyclub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,204subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001987378545 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cafoundationstudyclub |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cafoundationstudyclub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:42 | 3,204 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 3,208 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 3,215 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 3,213 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 3,214 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 3,214 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 58.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 41.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There are very few moments where words fall short... Rath Yatra is one of them. ❤️ The Lord of the Universe chooses to leave His temple, not because He has to, but because His love reaches every heart—without conditions, without boundaries. If you've been waiting for a sign, maybe this is it... Keep your faith alive. He is already on His way. Jai Jagannath. 🚩✨ @Devotional_Diary
📢 B.Com Students Alert! Join our channel for: ✅ Notes updates ✅ Study resources ✅ supported community ⚜Channel:- 🔗 @Bcomstudysquad ⚜Group:- 🔗 @bcomCrew Simplify your B.Com journey with us! 🎓
❤1
Kalyug ki sabse badi problem yeh nahi ki duniya badal gayi... problem yeh hai ki hamara mann har pal bhatakta rehta hai. Kabhi comparison... kabhi overthinking... kabhi endless scrolling... Aur phir hum kehte hain, "Mann shaant hi nahi hota." Sach toh yeh hai... jis mann ko har roz duniya bhar ki cheezein khilaoge, woh Bhagwan mein kaise lagega? Mobile galat nahi hai. Bas use ka purpose galat ho jata hai. Jis ph…
Sometimes, peace isn't found... it's remembered. ❤️ शान्ताकारं भुजगशयनं पद्मनाभं सुरेशं। विश्वाधारं गगनसदृशं मेघवर्णं शुभाङ्गम्॥ लक्ष्मीकान्तं कमलनयनं योगिभिर्ध्यानगम्यम्। वन्दे विष्णुं भवभयहरं सर्वलोकैकनाथम्॥ 🙏✨ Meaning: I bow to Lord Vishnu—the embodiment of peace, resting on the cosmic serpent, the support of the entire universe, whose divine form is as vast as the sky. He is the beloved of Lakshmi, lotus-eyed, …
🚨 Attention All Commerce Stream Students 🚨 We have created an Addlist that includes different Commerce-related groups! 🌟 Whether you're focused on CA, pursuing B.Com, or just need some study motivation, all the important groups are now in one place! 📚💡 By joining this Addlist, you’ll be automatically added to all the groups below. 🎯 LINK:- 👉 https://t.me/addlist/Dp0hpXvHYO9iZGI9 👈 📥 Don’t miss out on all the stu…
Maybe this isn't the perfect beginning. But it's the beginning I owe myself. 🌱 No more waiting for the right time, the right mood, or the right circumstances. Today, I simply choose to start again. One small step. One honest effort. That's how every beautiful comeback begins. ❤️ @Devotional_Diary
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2❤1
Result Out Whats your Results?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
CA Foundation Passing Percentage May 2026
🔥1
CA Foundation Toppers May 2026 Exams
🔥2
Result out 👀
CA Foundation May 2026 Results bas aate hi hoge 🔥 12 baje ke pehle aa jane chahiye Link- caresults.icai.org
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cafoundationstudyclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Result Out Whats your Results?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Study Club (foundation notes)” (@cafoundationstudyclub), 3,204 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cafoundationstudyclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.