Channel
CA FIGHTERS NOTES community👨🎓👨🎓
@cafighteresnotes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,857subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002115879243 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cafighteresnotes |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cafighteresnotes |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 2,857 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:46 | 2,859 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 2,859 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 2,860 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 2,865 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 2,866 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 2,867 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 2,869 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 2,875 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 2,876 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CARishabhJain · 70,206
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@theicai · 104,564
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@CA_Wallah_Intermediate · 46,816
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
@caraviagarwaloriginal · 26,737
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
@DARSHANKHAREFINALLAW · 27,472
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
@caindreshgandhi · 30,450
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 7 September 2026
@canitinguru · 24,630
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
@canewcourse · 31,608
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 5 September 2026
@camvsir · 45,578
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
@swapnilpatniclasses · 73,982
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@CANOTESCOMMUNITY · 36,374
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
@clearcainterwithsk · 64,592
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@CAInterLegends · 23,462
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
@neerajaroraclasses · 51,236
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@ManikondaKarthik · 37,099
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@cavijaysarda · 55,362
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
@chartered_studies · 102,922
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@vsmartacademyofficial · 35,888
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
@CAwallahbypw · 81,116
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
@CAnotes_ipcc · 45,555
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@namitaroraclasses · 47,223
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
@CAKapilGoyalAuditNotes · 27,327
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
@ACTArjunChhabraTutorial · 38,938
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
@Divyesh_Vaghela · 39,019
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CA FIGHTERS NOTES community👨🎓👨🎓” (@cafighteresnotes), 2,857 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cafighteresnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.