Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŸ“šβœπ•”π•’π••π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•  𝕕𝕖 π•£π•–π•—π•π•–π•©Γ•π•–π•€πŸ“šβœ

Channel

πŸ“šβœπ•”π•’π••π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•  𝕕𝕖 π•£π•–π•—π•π•–π•©Γ•π•–π•€πŸ“šβœ

@caderno_de_reflexoes

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,770subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001682376776
TypeChannel
Username@caderno_de_reflexoes
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/caderno_de_reflexoes

Growth

1,7701,7741,7726 August 2026 β€” 1,772 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 1,772 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 1,774 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 1,773 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 1,770 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,769–1,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:331,770-3
13 Aug 2026, 03:271,773-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:221,774+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:481,772no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:461,772first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 December 2024 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀2271.0%
πŸ‘722.6%
😭13.23%
πŸ™13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2024 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Mar 2026, 07:09 UTC832 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

β€œSe te atrapalhar tanto, olhe pelo retrovisor... parece um animal atropelado”, zombou meu marido enquanto me deixava sangrar na estrada, sem imaginar que nessa noite dei Γ  luz entre cascalho e jurei que minha filha veria seu impΓ©rio cair. O velocΓ­metro marcou mais de 120 km/h. Luzes de nΓ©on passavam como lΓ’minas no escuro. Mas o verdadeiro perigo nΓ£o estava lΓ‘ fora. Estava dentro do Range Rover. β€” VocΓͺ estΓ‘ exagerand…

9 Mar 2026, 07:09 UTCβ‰ˆ1,100 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

AtΓ© que o delegado decidiu analisar o microchip. NΓ£o era um simples acessΓ³rio. Era um dispositivo de acesso criptografado. Pertencia Γ  empresa de Julian. E o que estava armazenado ali nΓ£o eram fotos. Eram gravaΓ§Γ΅es. Áudios. TransaΓ§Γ΅es. Conversas. Uma delas fez o investigador congelar: β€” β€œTem que parecer acidente. Ela nΓ£o pode dar Γ  luz. Se essa crianΓ§a nascer, eu perco o controle.” Controle do quΓͺ? Do impΓ©rio. Julian…

❀1

20 Feb 2026, 07:20 UTC859 viewsread 7 August 2026

Siga o canal "Figurinhas Diversas" no WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBYTPtEwEjweC36aC1d

4 Jan 2026, 17:58 UTCβ‰ˆ1,430 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A adversidade nΓ£o bloqueia o caminho; ela seleciona quem estΓ‘ disposto a atravessΓ‘-lo.” πŸ“šβœ @caderno_de_reflexoes πŸ“šβœ

14 Dec 2025, 16:30 UTCβ‰ˆ1,790 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❀ Nosso encontro diΓ‘rio com ideias de artesanatos e deliciosas dicas de receitas fΓ‘ceis. πŸβ€πŸβ•― β€’*ΒΈ.β€’ ´¨༐).β€’ πŸβ€πŸΒ¨) ༐ (ΒΈ.β€’Β΄ΰΌŠ(.ΒΈ. β€’.β€β‹±ΰΌŠ β•­πŸβ€ β•­πŸβ€β•―ΰΌ ΰΌŠβ•­!πŸβ€ BEM-VINDOS AO @RECEITASEARTESANATO

❀1

12 Dec 2025, 16:14 UTCβ‰ˆ1,590 viewsread 7 August 2026

Siga o canal "Figurinhas Diversas" no WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBYTPtEwEjweC36aC1d

9 Sept 2025, 08:05 UTCβ‰ˆ2,640 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

β€‹β€‹πŸ“šβœ @caderno_de_reflexoes πŸ“šβœ

❀6

9 Sept 2025, 07:27 UTCβ‰ˆ2,350 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

β€‹β€‹πŸ“šβœ @caderno_de_reflexoes πŸ“šβœ

❀4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @caderno_de_reflexoes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 1,478,753 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ“šβœπ•”π•’π••π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•  𝕕𝕖 π•£π•–π•—π•π•–π•©Γ•π•–π•€πŸ“šβœβ€ (@caderno_de_reflexoes), 1,770 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caderno_de_reflexoes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.