There is a mistake in point 37 in DT Untested Areas file. The amount capitalized should be Rs. 100000 (since the payment of transportation cost is made in cash and it exceeds Rs. 10000)
👍7🙏1

Channel
@caanushreeagrawal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,094subscribers
+281 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001470850032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @caanushreeagrawal |
| Description | For any query, pls reach out to Team Level Up at 7708821751. This channel is solely for updates, revision videos and sharing notes on law and Income Tax for CA Inter students. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/caanushreeagrawal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 12,094 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 12,088 | +32 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 12,056 | +40 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 12,016 | +77 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 11,939 | +24 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 11,915 | +26 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 11,889 | +16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 11,873 | +39 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 11,834 | +15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 11,819 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 11,813 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (19 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 86,670 |
| Reactions total | 491 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
541 reactions across 26 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 311 | 57.5% | |
| 🔥 | 95 | 17.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 48 | 8.87% | |
| 🙏 | 29 | 5.36% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 5.18% | |
| 🤗 | 11 | 2.03% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 1.66% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 1.11% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.185% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.185% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 541reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There is a mistake in point 37 in DT Untested Areas file. The amount capitalized should be Rs. 100000 (since the payment of transportation cost is made in cash and it exceeds Rs. 10000)
👍7🙏1
Okay September 2026 students… this one is IMPORTANT. 👀 There are a few things I REALLY want you to look at before the exams. All the untested areas. So I put them all together. For Law. And for DT. One final checklist.
❤49❤🔥17🤗5
Dropping list of 100 untested areas in law and DT. Tonight.
🔥35❤🔥10❤5👍3🤗2
I’ve made a detailed video where I tell you exactly how you should attempt the CA Inter Tax paper in those 3 hours. Which questions first, when to sit for the total income question, how you can make sure you don’t run out of time. Checkpoint by checkpoint, for all three hours.
🔥7❤2🤗1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kq0PSu20CUk
🙏6❤5🤗1
File, posted without a caption
😍2❤1
Listen to me. It’s completely normal to feel scared. You might be questioning everything you’ve studied and wondering if you’ve done enough. Feeling scared or low doesn’t mean you’re not prepared. CA preparation is mentally exhausting, and sometimes even when we are doing well, our mind keeps telling us that we aren’t doing enough. The fear is real. But so is everything you’ve prepared for. ❤️
❤29🤗2🔥1😇1
https://youtu.be/tMc6Fmoo64A 5PM. Today.
❤12👍1😇1
These are the 35 qns we will be discussing
❤15❤🔥1
Hello guys. There's a small change. The Law session is preponed. Will be at 5PM today.
❤11👍5
Hi guys! ❤️ The DT new qns video seems to have been super helpful for you'll. Same way, I’m planning a special video with 35 new & unique questions for your Sept 2026 CA Inter Law. These are from S26 RTP, S26 MTP 1 & 2 and M26 QP, covering all the new questions you should see once before the exam. The video will be around 4.5 hours and will be premiered live on my youtube channel TODAY at 8PM. Channel Link: https…
❤31🙏6
These are the 22 qns that we will be solving.
❤15🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @caanushreeagrawal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@caanushreeagrawal edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Level Up with Anushree 🦸♀️” (@caanushreeagrawal), 12,094 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/caanushreeagrawal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.