Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net -892. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,995–13,155 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 10:55
12,129
-3
4 Nov 2026, 10:15
12,132
-11
3 Nov 2026, 10:09
12,143
-13
2 Nov 2026, 13:07
12,156
-14
1 Nov 2026, 14:54
12,170
-9
31 Oct 2026, 17:59
12,179
-7
30 Oct 2026, 17:06
12,186
-3
29 Oct 2026, 20:36
12,189
-10
28 Oct 2026, 21:49
12,199
-5
28 Oct 2026, 00:00
12,204
-11
27 Oct 2026, 02:25
12,215
-10
26 Oct 2026, 01:48
12,225
-3
25 Oct 2026, 02:46
12,228
-10
24 Oct 2026, 05:47
12,238
-2
23 Oct 2026, 03:56
12,240
-7
22 Oct 2026, 05:17
12,247
-8
21 Oct 2026, 01:17
12,255
-8
19 Oct 2026, 21:36
12,263
-7
18 Oct 2026, 18:58
12,270
-7
17 Oct 2026, 15:29
12,277
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.44%
avg views ÷ 12,129 subscribers
Avg views / post
902
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
32 (6 March 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
4,511
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 19:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
41
Videos
6
Links
88
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
750 reactions across 31 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
281
37.5%
🔥
210
28.0%
👍
69
9.20%
🥰
60
8.00%
👏
41
5.47%
💯
27
3.60%
😍
21
2.80%
🎉
10
1.33%
❤🔥
8
1.07%
🫡
7
0.933%
🆒
4
0.533%
😇
4
0.533%
🐳
3
0.4%
🦄
3
0.4%
😎
2
0.267%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 750 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
48
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 31 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @c8wallet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 March 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Canton Ecosystem Update [November 2, 2026]
(1) BlackRock filing discloses holding 6% of all common stock in Canton Strategic Holdings, effectively exposed to CC itself.
(2) C8 Wallet adds Limit Orders to its in-app trading platform, bringing more trading functionality to its users.
(3) Greywick Digital and Litecoin miner Luxxfolio explore using mined LTC to back the planned cLTC token.
(4) The Canton Foundation t…
Canton Ecosystem Update [October 26, 2026]
(1) The Canton Universal Burn framework passes its vote. If implemented, the proposal would extend CC fees/rewards to businesses using dedicated txn infrastructure.
(2) The Canton Foundation announces collaboration with multiple key blockchain stakeholders in Taiwan, covering tokenised Taiwanese assets and several other areas.
(3) The Canton Foundation's Tokenomics Commit…
Canton Ecosystem Update [October 19, 2026]
(1) Highlighted by CertiK Skynet, Canton generated more than $155 million in network fees in Q3 2026 - more than any other chain.
(2) Zebec Network integrates C8 Wallet by Cantor8 into its financial product suite.
(3) Canton Strategic Holdings releases its Q3 2026 Canton Network report, flagging a rise in Featured App applications and growth in the CC burn/mint ratio.
(4…
New C8 Wallet Registration Round!
Make sure to input the below code into the official 'Redeem Coupon' screen on either desktop or mobile.
Official Code: K3LMO5012X8ZQJP5395YK7E715INDBNT
Download: https://wallet.cantor8.tech/
Canton Ecosystem Update [October 13, 2026]
(1) Canton Foundation Development Fund climbs to 115.2M $CC deployed across 29 different funded teams, per data from Canton News.
(2) CertiK Skynet reports that Canton Network generated more than $155M worth of fees in Q3 2026, beating out all other chains.
(3) Digital Asset proposes construction of an application that would allow super validators to delegate their voting…
Canton Ecosystem Update [October 5, 2026]
(1) Cantor8 reveals official winners of its August 'Build on Canton' Hackathon.
(2) Edel Finance prepares to enable EDEL staking and CC reward generation for its community.
(3) Obsidian LLC joins the Canton Foundation's Collateral Subcommittee, chaired by The DTCC and following Cashen.
(4) Cantor8 and TradeCraft receive delivery-versus-payment (DvP) recognition from the C…
New C8 Wallet Registration Round
We're excited to open up a whole new round of registrations for our C8 Wallet.
Sign up using the below code in the 'Redeem Coupon' screen of the official C8 Wallet application.
Registration spaces are limited, so sign up before it's too late!
Official Code: 3E293MU0EMLOS9EJ8RBKQH113O60S8YR
Canton Ecosystem Update [September 28, 2026]
The Canton Network ecosystem is building momentum as we head into Q4 2026. Updates from the past week...
(1) Canton Network leads fee generation among all blockchain networks, with nearly $12M generated in the past week.
(2) Canton Development fund has now allocated some 90.7M CC across 27 funded teams.
(3) Alpend hits the $3M total value locked milestone and lists on …
Canton Ecosystem Update [September 21, 2026]
(1) Canton Network generated $11.2M in fees in the past week, and $1.5M in the last day alone, per DefiLlama data.
(2) The first ever official 'Canton Summit' took place in New York City on September 15, focusing on institutional adoption, collateral mobility, and regulated digital finance.
(3) Edel joined the DTC Digital Assets Solutions Industry Working Group, joining…
Canton Ecosystem Update [September 14, 2026]
(1) New proposal draft submitted that would see legendary firm a16z become a Canton Network super validator.
(2) Canton Network outpaces every other blockchain for monthly fee generation, with $49.95M in the past 30-day per DefiLlama data.
(3) Financial giant, Goldman Sachs, also proposed as a potential Canton Network super validator.
(4) Canton-based RWA perps DEX, Ca…
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @c8wallet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“C8 Wallet” (@c8wallet), 12,129 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c8wallet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.