Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for C11独家驱动解密

Channel

C11独家驱动解密

@c11nb6

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004364897677
TypeChannel
Usernames@c11nb6 @pisnb66678
Description批卡开端合作等联系 @qmnb66bot 禁止将c11上传qq微信等等大陆所有平台,这是不允许的,否则后果自负 c11仅供学习参考,切勿用于非法行为,下载后请务必在24小时内删除!
Created11 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held4
On Telegramt.me/c11nb6

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7612399.518 September 2026 — 76 subscribers18 September 2026 — 76 subscribers1 October 2026 — 117 subscribers5 October 2026 — 123 subscribers18 September 20265 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–130 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 11:22123+6
1 Oct 2026, 15:40117+41
18 Sept 2026, 16:2276no change
18 Sept 2026, 15:4776first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 11 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
302.4%
avg views ÷ 123 subscribers
Avg views / post
372
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.146%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held14 (11 September 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total4,464
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍583.3%
❤116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Oct 2026, 09:40 UTC15 viewsread 5 October 2026
Photo

就说一个字稳 不动内存 独家驱动就是爽 https://gtq.oopb.cn/shop/jgnb6

4 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

客户反馈小国单子号 https://luoye.yjsfk.cn/shop/J0PXWK5K

👍1

4 Oct 2026, 15:49 UTC≈1,220 views0 reactionsread 5 October 2026
Photo

王者内核.国庆首选辅助 独家方案.国庆畅玩 C11王者|稳定 · 高效 · 持续进化 🕠全网最准自瞄全网记录保持者守约x63 🚀功能齐全自动斩杀惩戒该有都有 🚨 独家驱动|拒绝市场泛滥方案 ⚡ 驱动架构优化 🔧 Hook 技术方案 🔐 核心数据解析 ☁️ 云端数据验证 🚀 性能优化|低延迟|高稳定 🔄 云端同步|持续更新|长期维护 驱动架构 + 核心技术 + 云端拦截验证 不拼堆料,只拼技术。 不做泛滥方案,只做稳定体验。 妈妈再也不用担心我月底遇到泛滥驱动了! 点我进入频道领取优惠券 点我赞助版卡网

12 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC197 views1 reactionsread 18 September 2026

卡网上架了免费的优惠卷30面额 限量5个 不买领取死全家

👍1

12 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC199 views1 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Poll

需不需要优惠点

  1. 优惠3075%
  2. 优惠202%
  3. 不优惠有钱25%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @c11nb6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

需不需要优惠点

  1. 优惠3075%
  2. 优惠202%
  3. 不优惠有钱25%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 5 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“C11独家驱动解密” (@c11nb6), 123 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c11nb6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.