Channel
@bymiqoo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
991subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001854212599 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bymiqoo |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bymiqoo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 991 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 994 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 994 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 June 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,392 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
61 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 36.1% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 31.1% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 24.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда окажусь там, буду ездить с такой же, только в руках и на гироскутере и в домашней майке, как истинный usa юникорн билдер 😁 Я не шучу, палатку для жилья и стрима *won't stop until I raise pre-seed* я уже купил. Онборд в местное уличное черное комьюнити я думаю будет жесткий, но я покажу что свой.
😁5
Еще хотел поделиться фани моментом, недавно сидел в чате США, задавал какой-то бытовой вопрос связанный с доками и один из людей ответил, что у меня забавная аватарка. Пару сообщений назад он писал, что ищет людей из VC с кем можно пересечься в нью-йорке, увидел это, я конечно же сразу полетел нетворкать. В итоге это оказался фаундер венчурного фонда, теперь у него есть один друг из России 😁 Иногда такие смолл то…
🔥5
Раньше не понимал проекты/людей которые строят слишком длинный онборд и бесплатные тестовые задачи+триал периоды, все так, пока не встанешь по ту сторону Я подметил те вещи, которые мне позволяют дать потенциальную оценку человека как специалиста в нанимаемой области еще до того как он выполнит тест или пройдет триал
👍1
Дорабатываю свой онборд флоу для того чтобы отсекать рыночный не релевантный шлак. Одна из ключевых задач СЕО — грамотная команда супергероев, которая сможет реализовать вижен и цели которые ставит фаундер. При этом, важно четко понимать, какими качествами должен обладать человек для позиции, иметь хорошие кейсы или просто хорошо выполнять работу — не более 30% критериев для апрува. Человек может неплохо выполнять …
🔥7❤1😁1
Дайте один ваш лучший инсайт по найму в команду
Сторонский тоже красавчик! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq0KhZU4wYY&t=2107s Вот ключевые инсайты: Команда мечты (Dream Team): В компании работают «звездные игроки». Руководитель здесь — строгий тренер. Он дает честную и прямую обратную связь, чтобы развивать сильные стороны каждого. Полная ответственность (True Ownership): Менеджеры управляют своими проектами, как отдельными бизнесами. Они несут ответственност…
❤2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvbW9GhTfDI Уникальный и близкий мне по духу и вижену человек, захотелось поделиться с вами этим шикарным подкастом. Очень вдохновительные и правильные слова про команду, для себя также подтвердил гипотезу, что нужно собирать супергероев, нужно собирать команду. Не сотрудников, сам по себе термин "сотрудник" какой-то уебский, поэтому уже сейчас почти завершили операционку по продукта…
Чето обратно хочется 😁
😁5
Хоум свит хоум
😁4🔥1
Все, газуем в Екб наконец
🔥4❤1
Я в Актау! Жаль пересадка довольно короткая, тут вроде бы очень красиво
🔥2
Было бы круто если каждое государство придет к супер-апп чат-боту, вроде гпт. Зачем человеку совершать десяток действий с целью получить какую-либо услугу, если это можно сделать за один промпт и за 1 минуту, нежели ждать что-то неделями или даже месяцами. И тем более куда-то таскаться. Чтобы снизить нагрузку нужно сделать национальных курьеров, что-то вроде Яндекс доставки только с документами, ввести платный форм…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bymiqoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 477,711 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“₿Y.Miqoo” (@bymiqoo), 991 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bymiqoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.