Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Birdie's mob

@bye_bye_birdie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,028subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002146687009
TypeChannel
Username@bye_bye_birdie
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bye_bye_birdie

Growth

2,0262,0282,0277 August 2026 — 2,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,026 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,027 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,026 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,028 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,026–2,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:082,028+2
11 Aug 2026, 04:512,026-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:412,027+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:322,026no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:342,026first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.8%
avg views ÷ 2,028 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (14 February 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,790
Reactions total263
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,017 reactions across 19 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
86642.9%
🔥26613.2%
❤‍🔥24312.0%
😱1628.03%
👍1246.15%
🥰1095.40%
😭582.88%
💋482.38%
😢301.49%
🫡271.34%
🕊160.793%
🎉140.694%
👻120.595%
💘90.446%
👾70.347%
💔60.297%
🍓50.248%
👌50.248%
😁50.248%
🤮30.149%
2 further kinds20.099%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,017reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bye_bye_birdie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 February 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,700 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вышел видик, лороведы нападайте: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijDW4ellevc я прошу прощения за три поста у меня альцгеймер

75🔥21❤‍🔥13🍓3🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC≈1,090 views150 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

я не хочу ничего загадывать, но кажется, сегодня будет видеоролик по вайтнукле 🌚 5 месяцев без видеоролика... 5! не зря не загадывал, завтра дропну, чет заебался

😱9237👻12🔥8👏1

8 Jul 2026, 04:39 UTC≈2,470 views178 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

дописал кулачковый сценарий опять проебу дедлайны по дропу видика, зато кучу лора копнул

🔥12730❤‍🔥12💘7💋2

15 Jun 2026, 06:23 UTC≈3,450 views122 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Дорогие папищники, я ебнул бустан. Без импульсивных решений и всякой говны, мне совестно брать копейку за пустыню, в которой тока перекати-поле шароебится из стороны в сторону. Это никакое не импульсивное 13 у.о действие, почувствую что есть вайбы что-то туда кидать — сделаю заново. А пока чета не идет с этой платформой никак. Паписки все послетали, по идее деняк с вас брать плафторма больше не будет. Но на всякий

73😢30🕊16💋2🔥1

9 Jun 2026, 06:41 UTC≈3,650 views140 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Небольшой апдейт закину по своей ситуации с провайдером. Вкратце, у меня рушится обска и спустя пару секунд стримы обрубаются в ноль. Я на днях в сердцах высрал пару гневных постов, потом злость утихла и я все это дело потер. Что сейчас собсна: ОБСке пиздец, стримить невозможно. Много чего попробовал, в попытках дошел даже до Никиты ре2д. Никита, кста, пиздатый мужчина, большое ему спасибо за попытки оказать мне пом

86😭40🔥11🥰2👍1

2 Jun 2026, 16:42 UTC≈3,620 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

многоуважаемые папищники, я ищу художников я по-прежнему работаю с мистером Жариком, но всякие штуки бывают и поэтому, мне бы хотелось, чтобы на случай какой-то штуки, у меня было кому написать и попросить нарисовать мне картиночку поэтому, если вы рисуете в диджитале всякие приколы, напишите мне, покидайте работы пж: https://t.me/dosviedanya обычно мне нужны тока превьюшки, ценник дефолтный 2.5-3к деняк, но если п

66🍓1💋1

24 May 2026, 20:47 UTC≈3,640 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026

многоуважаемые папищники, тут старый узнал что можно канал бустить оказывается в тг и как мне сказали уважаемые люди — это даже не считается практикой попрошайничества, а нормальная тема с вас бусты, с меня кастомное оформление канала, мена? https://t.me/boost/bye_bye_birdie https://t.me/boost/bye_bye_birdie https://t.me/boost/bye_bye_birdie

51❤‍🔥10🥰8💔6🔥2

18 May 2026, 12:05 UTC≈4,220 views130 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

не дождался до среды, решил повыебываться сегодня. смотрите, жабы! не просто жабы, а фирхангерные жабы. так называемая Жабари и ее друг Гробожаба жаб сделала Даша, замечательная жаболепница. у нее даже есть свой тг канал, где кастомные жабки на любой вкус: https://t.me/p0cherkushky https://t.me/p0cherkushky https://t.me/p0cherkushky эти жабы настока крутые, что мы их разыграем среди папищников моего тг канала и кан

88❤‍🔥32🔥6👾3💋1

7 May 2026, 09:44 UTC≈3,130 views121 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

анонсирую арку стримов превозмогания чт — видики страшилки пт — The Excavation of Hob’s Barrow сб — сабвей серфер)))) вс — аук превозмогание тому шо я не курю за компуктером больше, чувствую фляга будет ужасно протекать все эти дни все как обычно 16:00 по мск ладно, я так вкину для интереса мож кто-то пропустил: я не курю больше пачки и тока на балконе, я не пью энербобсики (вообще), я готовлю дома каждый день с

❤‍🔥8624🥰10💋1

18 Apr 2026, 13:49 UTC≈3,320 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ой а кто это такой нарушающий законы физики и скорости? мистер птица топ-3 на данный момент на хардкордной мапе в Idols of Ash, не зря качался на веревке и дрочил копейки ран можно чекнуть тут: https://youtu.be/jbgBIfUanPU?si=CpNM172PIrYQ47_Z

❤‍🔥53🎉146😁2💋1

18 Apr 2026, 03:44 UTC≈3,130 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026

многоуважаемые геймеры, ко мне обратились студентка психфака Алиса и попросила расшарить линк-опросник, делает диплом и собирает инфу по теме я посмотрел за вас, ничего страшного там не увидел, если интересно то можете пройти тема опросника — Особенности эмоциональной регуляции и стрессоустойчивости у лиц, увлекающихся компьютерными играми пройти тут: https://forms.gle/ehWDYEXhmdizREo3A для Алисы: если вопросы бу

👍5017❤‍🔥7👌5🍓1

20 Mar 2026, 03:59 UTC≈3,840 views84 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

здравствуйте, расписание на эту неделю: пт — FAITH сб — старый устал вс — To the moon АХАХАХХА БЛЕКСУС ДВА Сорьки, чуточку подредачил, сегодня делами бытовыми займусь (сегодня это суббота) 16 по мск

58👍11🔥9❤‍🔥3🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bye_bye_birdie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 151,777 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Birdie's mob” (@bye_bye_birdie), 2,028 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bye_bye_birdie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.