Краснодар, дом, муж тренер, своя баскетбольная команда, трое детей, и я. #MKPCI
Канал с ежедневными эфирами о мозге https://t.me/zavtrak_s_Kilinoy
Регистрация в РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68d5287885fb133355e0325a
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
20 measurements spanning 22 days, net +76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,079–11,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 05:24
11,168
+1
28 Aug 2026, 06:52
11,167
+3
27 Aug 2026, 07:42
11,164
-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:12
11,167
-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:15
11,168
-2
24 Aug 2026, 01:27
11,170
-2
22 Aug 2026, 08:35
11,172
-6
20 Aug 2026, 19:35
11,178
+3
18 Aug 2026, 23:08
11,175
+5
17 Aug 2026, 19:29
11,170
+3
16 Aug 2026, 15:23
11,167
+2
14 Aug 2026, 23:38
11,165
-2
13 Aug 2026, 15:38
11,167
+2
12 Aug 2026, 14:44
11,165
+4
11 Aug 2026, 12:28
11,161
-1
10 Aug 2026, 16:01
11,162
+12
9 Aug 2026, 12:34
11,150
+12
8 Aug 2026, 12:37
11,138
+36
7 Aug 2026, 12:30
11,102
+10
7 Aug 2026, 06:45
11,092
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.2%
avg views ÷ 11,168 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,040
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
18 (28 June 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
16,150
Reactions total
1,114
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
286
Videos
139
Links
31
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
1m 29s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,561 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
2,927
44.6%
🔥
1,846
28.1%
😁
1,278
19.5%
👍
299
4.56%
🤩
200
3.05%
💯
11
0.168%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,561reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итак, рубрика #две_книги_ноль_выводов - потому что мы тут не для выводов и не на скорость читаем, а просто для удовольствия. В этот раз у нас:
1️⃣ Эти ваши «Тревожные люди» Фредрик Бакман. Меня чуть не укачало, чесслово, но это было классно. Задорно, весело (я несколько раз прям хихикнула), остроумно и динамично. Я пока только учусь читать художку, но как же автор их всех чувствует. Он подмечает такие мелочи, такие …
Единственное моё дело на сегодня - написать пост про книги в ТГ (Потому что они скопились безбожно).
Единственное моё дело на неделю - провести проект-вспышку (очень это люблю, всё уже готово, я просто незримо учавствую) и… увидеть Волгу.
Это что вообще такое я вас спрашиваю? Это как вообще?
*это мы на турнир в Тольятти команду вывозим. Фото из поезда грузиться будет 1000 лет. Но с другой стороны, а че еще делать?…
На днях делала серию сториусов и немного по пути присвоила себе всемогущества)))
Посыл был таков, что я могу вести проект по планированию и организации жизни, потому что если бы я этого не умела, то фиг бы я вообще в своем уме осталась с теми ролями и задачами, что у меня есть.
И то что я спустя 7 лет переупаковала этот проект, дак это потому что я родила еще пару детей, прошла пару учеб, прочла пару сотен книг и з…
Итак, книги буду выкладывать парами. Чтоб вы тоже мне рекомендовать новенькое успевали (говорю так, будто не читаю как улитка).
Короче я сделаю рубрику #две_книги_ноль_выводов - потому что мы тут не для выводов и не на скорость читаем, а просто для удовольствия. Итак. В этот раз у нас:
1️⃣ «Позже» Стивен Кинг.
Мой первый осознанный Кинг. Я ненавижу ужасы, поэтому из Кинга я читала за всю свою жизнь только «Как пис…
Посмотрела ну чудо какой добрый фильм. С детьми. Улыбалась целый час.
Ела голубику, обнимала дочь и улыбалась. В фильме не происходит ничего. Но он абсолютно прекрасен.
Его снял Джон Траволта. Он, помимо актера, пилот-фанатик. И коллекционер частных самолетов. И вообще не последний человек в авиа-сообществе. И мне кажется этот фильм - это какой-то его переработанный опыт. Какой-то прекрасный и прекрасно-переработан…
Рубрика: спорт-спорт-турбоспорт (нет)
Но решила вас держать в курсе своих движений с командой. Спортивный подкаст получается. Но я стараюсь сделать это полезным для всех. Даже если из спорта у вас только ритерспорт 🍫
Я будто прочла две противоположные книги. Обе мне не понравились, но ни об
одной не пожалела. Интригаааааа
#две_книги_ноль_выводов
«Йелоуфейс» - очень понравилась изнанка издательского дела. Никогда не думала, что в художке все вот так. Щас начала другую книгу - и походу да. Именно так. И от людей из этой сферы слышала, что это жиза. Позновательно. Но какой же медленный сюжет. Просто читаешь какую то чужую мысленну…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @by_Kilina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 298,492 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Килина” (@by_Kilina), 11,168 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/by_Kilina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
