Channel
@bxcx666
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
444subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001478519310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bxcx666 |
| Created | 27 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bxcx666 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 444 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 439 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 439 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 April 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,340 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
133 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👾 | 53 | 39.8% | |
| 🍓 | 28 | 21.1% | |
| 🌭 | 21 | 15.8% | |
| 🦄 | 17 | 12.8% | |
| 🐳 | 13 | 9.77% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.752% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bxcx666. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Короче, я купил пантограф, чтобы снимать на телефон стол и решил вкатиться влететь с ноги в видео-блогерство умножение скорби. Я правда не знаю, нахуя, но когда наконец у меня появится минутка, я хотел бы записать видос. В связи с этим вопрос: достаточно ли будет заливать в ТГ или ютуб будет удобнее? Вряд ли систематически я буду что-то делать — скорее, время от времени. Если вам похуй, то сделаем наотъебись, тяп-ляп…
Posted without readable text
Ой, важный апдейт. Знаете, как в FM-1 определить, какой оператор кериер, а какой модулятор? Никак. Учите алгоритмы.
🐳1
Posted without readable text
🦄3👾2🌭1
Тем временем 1 июля вышла вторая версия архитектуры NAM — A2. Как сообщается, клонирование аппаратуры теперь такое точное, что уже ну прям совсем неотличимое от оригинала в 100%. Типа, квад кортексы 95% набирают, а NAM-2 уже ультимативно копирует. И самое главное, что лайт-версия теперь еще меньше вычислительных мощностей занимает и может работать на совсем дешевом говне. Я не знаю, обновят ли прошивки уже имеющиеся …
Говорят, что сегодня в Леобласти ебнули дронами не только по складам вайлдбухи ебучей, но и по касательно досталось складам пятерочки, которая, помимо всего прочего, через свою инфраструктуру доставляет посылки Цайняо, которые в свою очередь доставляют мне мой ультра-дешевый фм-синтезатор. Я просто хотел поделиться с вами тем, насколько охуительны причины для беспокойства за посылку в 2026 году. А впрочем, в моей юн…
👾16🐳2
Мне безумно нравится моя гитара Данэлектро, просто инструмент мечты, очень красивая. Но стоковые звучки очень хилые: нэковый прям жухлый-жухлый, а бриджевый прям вообще без низа. Единственное юзабельное положение — оба включены, потому, что по отдельности они даже как эффект не работали. Я поменял оба на Теслу и это поправило положение, во всяком случае на нэке с фуззом стало интересно играть, бридж стал повесомей, н…
🍓11🌭1
Как выразился Егор, барабанщик HEXE, Позоров, гитарист Зачарованных и Укус женщины, за эти деньги — это расходник. Прямо сейчас заказываю. Это даже смешно, это будет самый дешевый синтезатор, что я купил в жизни, считая Ямаху ПСС и детский Кассио.
🐳6
Китайский производитель педалей и эффект-процессоров M-VAVE выкатил синтезатор FM-1, клон DX-7 с шестью встроенными эффектами, один из которых фильтр. Будет стоить около 100$ и, думаю, что на алиэкспрессе примерно за этот прайс его и можно будет вырубить. По-моему круто!
👾6🍓1
Беринжер — синтезаторы дьявола. С момента выхода первых бехровских клонов образовалась определенная временная перспектива, которая позволяет оценить, что вообще произошло. С одной стороны, то, что Бехра воскресила довольно многие классические модели синтов и драм-машин — это просто охуенно: оригинальные производители выбрали странную стратегию по отношению к своим легаси-продуктам, за что и поплатились. С другой стор…
🌭6👾5🍓3🦄1
Если вы не в России и вас кто-нибудь будет спрашивать, мол, как дела-то в России, вот вам эпизод: я сделал кое-что красивое и абсолютно безобидное для кое-кого, но если я начну хвастаться, мне по-любому прилетит что-то неприятное. А я очень хочу, поверьте — не каждый день такое бывает. Поэтому приходится хвастаться лично и устно. А это совсем не то же самое, что красиво оформлять посты с кое-чем. Я бы больше хотел за…
👾16🍓5🐳2
Photo, posted without a caption
🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bxcx666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BxCx” (@bxcx666), 444 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bxcx666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.