Channel
@buzzeum
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
748subscribers
-106 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002292044182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @buzzeum |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/buzzeum |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 16:02 | 748 | -19 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 767 | -42 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 809 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 817 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 830 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 838 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 848 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 854 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 854 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 16 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com February 16, 2026 at 03:47PM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2023424118994133467 The attention economy already shifted. Most people just haven’t caught up yet.Visibility no longer lives on timelines, it lives on-chain.At , we’re turning real social activity into verifiable signals, so attention becomes measurable, composable, and actually useful.
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com February 12, 2026 at 06:57AM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2021840974503100679 This is a shift in how attention is treated.We’re moving from fleeting social signals to verifiable, on-chain proof of engagement.is building the infrastructure where visibility, interaction, and reach become measurable, transparent, and composable. https://t.co/2SBjjp5bAM
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com February 08, 2026 at 02:41PM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2020508301193093403 We don’t rely on vibes or promises, we rely on data.With AMPLIFY, social activity is recorded, verifiable, and transparent on-chain.Every post, interaction, and signal becomes something you can actually prove, not just claim.
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com February 04, 2026 at 09:51AM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2018985679116513330 When attention starts carrying value, trust can’t be vibes-based anymore. You need:• Verifiable on-chain engagement• Transparent attribution• Persistent social data• Incentives aligned with real activityturns social actions into provable signals on-chain.
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com February 01, 2026 at 07:35AM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2017864391035674684 Happy new month from Buzzeum New month, same focus:turning real engagement into verifiable on-chain data,and making attention something that actually lasts.More building. More signal. Less noise.Let’s ship🫶 | ❤️
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com January 29, 2026 at 05:40PM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2016929370460340705 Social attention doesn’t fail because people don’t engage.It fails because attention isn’t owned, tracked, or provable once it leaves the timeline.fixes this by turning social activity into on-chain data – where visibility is measurable, ownership is clear, and value https://t.co/cwnHKqmbgR
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com January 26, 2026 at 11:14AM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2015745194562294150 Social attention moves fast, but most of it disappears without leaving any real signal.At , social activity becomes verifiable on-chain data, not just impressions.Mentions, engagement, and reach turn into measurable proof.That’s how visibility becomes something you
❤1
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com January 23, 2026 at 01:00PM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2014684746790412595 Attention usually fades the moment the feed refreshes.buzzeum AMPLIFY flips that by anchoring social activity on-chain.What people do becomes measurable, verifiable data.That’s how engagement stops being noise and starts meaning something.
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com January 19, 2026 at 03:09PM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2013267534485614766 In the old model, growth is measured by vanity metrics that go stale fast. Static engagement is a liability.AMPLIFY is turning attention into something measurable and actionable using onchain incentives, automation, and execution layers. No guesswork, just systems that
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com January 17, 2026 at 03:19PM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2012545319888679233 Culture and knowledge shouldn’t be gated by platforms or algorithms.At we are building infrastructure that lets ideas, creators, and communities surface on their own terms – open, measurable, and owned by the people who participate. https://t.co/DTFTaTYQ9O
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com January 14, 2026 at 10:23AM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2011383706087563627 As digital culture becomes more immersive and always-on, the question isn’t content, it’s ownership.Creators should benefit from attention without giving up control or context.That’s the direction is building toward. https://t.co/tAdMr1ugxW
Checkout our latest tweet on X.com January 12, 2026 at 09:09AM https://twitter.com/buzzeum/status/2010640239740793106 Our vision for accessible digital ownership keeps taking shape.Every new creator onboarded opens more ways for communities to participate and engage. | https://t.co/IIIyqvy2dD
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @buzzeum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Buzzeum” (@buzzeum), 748 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buzzeum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.