Channel
@butscoach
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,074subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002049392971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @butscoach |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/butscoach |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 1,074 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 1,069 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 1,062 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 1,062 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
284 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 177 | 62.3% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 17.6% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 5.28% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 4.93% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 3.52% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 2.82% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.06% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.704% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.704% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.352% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.352% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.352% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Недавно летал с двумя разными командирами. Оба примерно одного возраста, оба много лет работают пилотами, получают хорошие деньги. Но результат совершенно разный. У одного капитал, акции, недвижимость, финансовая подушка. Он спокойный, уверенный и счастливый. Реально одно удовольствие находится с человеком Он инвестирует постоянно, покупает золото, акции. Какие-то действия с недвижимостью У другого практически ни…
❤26👍6⚡5🤔1🙏1
Channel name was changed to «Буц Андрей | Инвестиции, психология, коучинг»
Прилетел утром из Казахстана, очень крутой выдался рейс Уже по счету пятый коллега пилот на работе с капиталом более миллиона долларов, который сделал его не на авиации И у всех одно направление, которое меня удивило, оно очень нетипичное Дайте реакций, если интересно, завтра расскажу
❤45🔥5
Почему женщина не выбирает мужчину? 🤝 - Как нас обманывали с детства? - На что на самом деле реагирует женщина? - Финансы решают всё? Как без них? - Главные манипуляции и многое другое
❤🔥14🔥4🕊2❤1
Мужчины, поставьте любую реакцию здесь, хочу узнать сколько вас Готовлю аудио на тему - «Почему женщина вас не выбирает?»
❤14
Почему человек внезапно исчезает из вашей жизни и уходит в игнор📍 - Как вы сами создаёте это? - Как вернуть человека? - Как перепрошить мозг и выбирать «своих партнеров» Связь со мной: @butsandrey737
❤30🔥7🍓3🥰2
Channel name was changed to «Буц Андрей | Психология, НЛП, life коучинг»
Психосоматика проблем с кожей: нестандартное мнение - причины - решения - почему не проходит
🔥21❤4👍3
Друзья, что-то я реже стал вести этот телеграм канал в связи с возвращением в авиацию Но все равно появляется внутреннее желание иногда поделиться какой-то новой полезной информацией, ведь я все таки еще и коуч ) Плюс мои друзья часто пишут, что любили слушать мой контент Ну как друзья, мама. Не будем врать друг другу Ладно, шучу Буду здесь время от времени делиться своими инсайтами, мыслями на тему психологии,…
❤12⚡2😁1
Channel name was changed to «10000 футов | Буц Андрей»
Channel photo updated
Хочу з вами поспілкуватись, в субботу проведу ефір безкоштовний з моїм партнером по одному із направлень «Психологія прориву в блозі». Суббота 11:00 за Україною Розповім як сором, синдром самозванцю, страхи заважають вам досягати класних результатів А партнер розкаже про круті та нові інструменти в стратегії та просуванні Йти всім, хто: - довго робить контент, а вихлопу немає - хоче навчитись робити в блозі 5-10…
❤5⚡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @butscoach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 631,031 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@butscoach named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Буц Андрей | НЛП, психология, реализация” (@butscoach), 1,074 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/butscoach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.