客户评价:天鹅湖万达 御姐与娇小类型的妹子 给客户推荐的 照片仅供参考
❤3🔥2👍1

Channel
@butlloll
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
36,600subscribers
+15,094 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002290961367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @butlloll |
| Description | 私聊小李 @xia77121 双向机器人 @xia77121_bot 推广 @hefeixiaoli(合肥) |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/butlloll |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:54 | 36,600 | +68 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:39 | 36,532 | -40 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 36,572 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 36,583 | +58 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:17 | 36,525 | +25 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 36,500 | +113 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 36,387 | -20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:47 | 36,407 | +130 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 36,277 | +94 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 36,183 | +146 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:59 | 36,037 | +66 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 35,971 | +281 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 35,690 | +56 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 35,634 | +132 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 09:59 | 35,502 | +59 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:07 | 35,443 | +131 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 35,312 | +128 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:11 | 35,184 | +258 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:39 | 34,926 | +305 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 34,621 | first reading |
153 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 153 (7 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 83,975 |
| Reactions total | 758 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 04:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
790 reactions across 64 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 216 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 181 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 150 | 19.0% | |
| 😁 | 66 | 8.35% | |
| 🎉 | 62 | 7.85% | |
| 👏 | 58 | 7.34% | |
| 🥰 | 57 | 7.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 790 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 58 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
客户评价:天鹅湖万达 御姐与娇小类型的妹子 给客户推荐的 照片仅供参考
❤3🔥2👍1
客户评价:瑶海万达7号 颜值一般 服务没得说
👍4❤2🔥1
今日战略启动:1️⃣1️⃣🟰💋5️⃣ 😀核心运营时段:中午12点30-凌晨3:00 #合肥中项 #合肥95 今日我们荣幸地迎来了众多行业精英(头牌妹子)的加入! 🫶政务区:天鹅湖万达广场 :天珑广场 :天珑广场 ➡️瑶海区:恒大中央广场美宜佳:瑶海万达广场:银河商务中心3号楼 🎯包河区:珀金汉宫:和地公寓 🔔滨湖区 :琼林B座 💰支持多元化支付生态:现金-支付宝口令红包-USDT-📩 😀多人同行,尊享协同优惠 ❤️今日重点推荐:BBW 御姐 少妇 瑶海新晋00后潜力股加入!包河区头部资源回归,万达新锐头部资源上线
🔥4❤2👍1
客户评价:滨湖新人妹子
❤5👍3🔥3
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7371949686
❤3👍2
客户评价:滨湖1号 反馈可以的
👍5🔥5❤2
客户评价:1号妹子归来
👍5❤1🔥1
1号回归😀😀😀
👍5❤2🔥1
客户评价:包河区6号新人
❤4👍2🔥1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7371949686
🔥8❤4👍2
今日战略启动:1️⃣0️⃣🟰3️⃣0️⃣ 😀核心运营时段:中午12点30-凌晨3:00 #合肥中项 #合肥95 今日我们荣幸地迎来了众多行业精英(头牌妹子)的加入! 🫶政务区:天鹅湖万达广场 :天珑广场 :天珑广场 ➡️瑶海区:恒大中央广场美宜佳:瑶海万达广场:银河商务中心3号楼 🎯包河区:珀金汉宫:和地公寓 🔔滨湖区 :琼林B座 💰支持多元化支付生态:现金-支付宝口令红包-USDT-📩 😀多人同行,尊享协同优惠 ❤️今日重点推荐:BBW 御姐 少妇 瑶海新晋00后潜力股加入!包河区头部资源回归,万达新锐头部资源上线
❤4🔥3👍1
客户评价:天鹅湖万达之前的30号
❤8👍3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @butlloll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @butlloll as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“合肥中项95必玩榜(评价)” (@butlloll), 36,600 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/butlloll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.