Channel
@butirpencerahan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,005subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001341068671 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @butirpencerahan |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/butirpencerahan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:36 | 1,005 | +1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 1,004 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 1,004 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 May 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 181 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dalil Akal Atas Keberadaan Allah (1) Terkadang manusia telah mengalami kerusakan fitrahnya, dengan munculnya berbagai kerancuan. Maka diperlukan dalil akal untuk lebih memahaminya. 1. Al-Khalqu wal Ijad (Penciptaan dan Pengadaan) Diantara dalil akal yang paling kuat untuk membuktikan keberadaan Tuhan adalah dalil penciptaan dan pengadaan (al-khalq wal ijad). Bahwa satu persatu yang ada di alam ini, jika kita menga…
👍1
Ketidak-azali-an alam ini (temporal, tidak eternal), bahkan diakui pula oleh ilmuwan Atheis sendiri, misalnya yang paling populer adalah Stephen Hawking, ia berkata, "Bersamaan dengan akumulasi dalil empiris dan teoritis, telah menjadi jelas, bahkan sangat-sangat jelas, bahwa alam ini mesti ada waktu permulaannya, hingga telah sempurna pembuktian atas hal itu secara final pada tahun 1970 M." (Tarikh Mujaz liz Zaman, …
👍1
Seringkali penilaian terhadap seseorang atau ulama, berangkat dari sentimen, kebencian, atau bisa jadi perasaan dendam terhadap afiliasi tertentu, sehingga tidak objektif. Pokoknya kalau lawan afiliasi, madzhab atau pendapatnya, maka ia tidak punya kadar dalam keilmuan, atau kecil tidak ada apa-apanya, dinihilkan dan direndahkan. Sikap seperti ini berbahaya, karena akan banyak jatuh pada banyak dosa: merendahkan keho…
Masih Adakah Rasa Pengingkaran Di Dalam Hati Kita Terhadap Kemungkaran? https://www.instagram.com/p/DcgHeeSlESL/?igsi=MWJjY3hkcDk0anYwcg==
Sudahkah kita merasa gelisah dengan keburukan yang kita hadapi, yang dengan itu semoga menjadi sebab Allah memberikan petunjuk dan solusi? Wallahul Muwaffiq. (Muhammad Atim) t.me/butirpencerahan Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/DceAOlxlEs7/?igsi=NDRyaHNuMWNmbWF2
Di Saat Gelisah Itulah, Akhirnya Solusi Wahyu Datang Kepada Rasulullah ﷺ Datangnya suatu petunjuk/hidayah yang menuntun kepada jalan kebenaran, atau solusi dari ketidakberesan, seringkali, bahkan mesti diawali dengan rasa kegelisahan. Gelisah terhadap kondisi diri yang belum kunjung menggapai jalan hidup yang baik. Gelisah terhadap lingkungan yang tidak positif, bahkan rusak. Gelisah terhadap kondisi negara yang ca…
Karena dengan keterbatasan akalnya, manusia seringkali berbeda pandangan dan pandangannya bersifat relatif (nisbi), dan cendrung dipengaruhi oleh motif kepentingan masing-masing, sehingga tanpa adanya standar itu, yang akan terjadi adalah kekacauan. Maka standar moral itu tidak bisa tidak melainkan harus bersumber dari Tuhan yang Esa yang Maha Tahu dan Maha Adil terhadap hamba-Nya. Jadi, justru fitrah ini adalah dal…
Apa Maksud Dalil Fitrah Atas Keberadaan Allah? Masih Ada Yang Gagal Paham Oleh : Muhammad Atim Ada sebagian orang, baik itu kalangan Mutakallimin (Ahli Kalam) maupun Atheis, yang menolak dalil fitrah atas keberadaan Allah. Mereka mengatakan ini adalah doktrin yang dibawa oleh Ibnu Taimiyyah rahimahullah. Padahal, ini bukan sebatas doktrin yang dibawa oleh Syaikhul Islam Ibnu Taimiyyah rahimahullah, tetapi digunaka…
❤1👍1
Masih melanjutkan kajian pendalaman ilmu Aqidah dengan rincian masail dan hujjah-hujjahnya, sebagai bagian rangkaian syarah terhadap aqidah Wasithiyyah. Bisa offline dan online via Zoom, gratis atau bisa infak seikhlasnya rutin setiap Kamis malam Jum'at (20.00 sd 21.30 WIB). Yang mau gabung bisa masuk ke group khusus pembahasan aqidah, baru dibuat. Bagi yang minat saja untuk belajar, bisa diskusi secara ilmiah dan be…
Hal Sederhana Tentang Sifat Allah Para penolak sifat Allah tidak akan paham hal sederhana ini, karena pikiran mereka telah terjerat oleh doktrin teori jisim yang membuat rumit. Yaitu bahwa dzat Allah itu satu, dan ia memiliki sifat-sifat. Sifat-sifat itu bukanlah perkara di luar dzat, tetapi melekat pada dzat, meskipun sifat-sifat itu banyak, tidak bertentangan dengan keesaan dzat, semuanya menunjukkan dzat yang sa…
Dan hal tersebut juga tidak layak dibicarakan berkaitan dengan hak Allah. Allah Maha Mulia untuk dikaitkan dengan hal-hal remeh tersebut. Makanya dalam hal penafian sebagai tanzih (pensucian), Allah mengajarkannya dengan penafian global, tanpa harus dirinci, yaitu tidak ada satupun makhluk yang sama dengan-Nya. Semoga Allah membimbing kita pada hal-hal yang jelas yang telah Ia sampaikan. Wallahul Muwaffiq. (Muhamm…
Kuatnya Syubhat Doktrin Jisim Syubhat doktrin teori "jisim" ini sangat kuat dalam membuat orang untuk menolak sifat Allah, berapapun kadar penolakannya. Makanya para ulama Salaf, dan merekalah Ahlus Sunnah sebenarnya, mengecam metode kalam dengan penggunaan teori jisim tersebut, karena menjadi sebab para penolak sifat Allah. Ketika dinyatakan secara jelas di dalam nash bahwa Allah memiliki wajah, tangan, mata, dll…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @butirpencerahan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Butir Pencerahan” (@butirpencerahan), 1,005 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/butirpencerahan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.