Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BusySpace

Channel

BusySpace

@busy_space

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001379662186
TypeChannel
Username@busy_space
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/busy_space

Growth

8385846 August 2026 — 83 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83 subscribers15 August 2026 — 84 subscribers23 August 2026 — 85 subscribers6 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 04:4585+1
15 Aug 2026, 02:1284+1
9 Aug 2026, 17:3283no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:3083first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
17.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
23.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 May 20263 August 2026)
Views total17
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3538.5%
👍2628.6%
🔥2022.0%
👏77.69%
😱22.20%
🤩11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Смотрите, что у нас! Подготовили инструкцию, как проверить франшизу перед покупкой

3🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC55 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Не класть палочки и другие приборы в доставку — экономия или забота о природе? Делится мнением «Важная рыба»

👍31

9 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC49 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

CRM-система — это инструмент для управления продажами, клиентской базой и бизнес-процессами компании. Она помогает хранить информацию о клиентах в одном месте, контролировать работу менеджеров, автоматизировать рутинные задачи и повышать эффективность продаж. Разбираемся, как выбрать CRM-систему для бизнеса, на какие функции обратить внимание и какие российские сервисы стоит рассмотреть.

👍2

7 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC46 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ИИ больше не преимущество, а ожидание клиента. По данным исследования, уже более половины рекламных агентств получают запросы на создание рекламы с помощью ИИ, а 93% агентств сами используют нейросети в работе. Но главный вопрос — в том, как превратить нейросеть в прибыль. Вот где агентство может заработать больше уже сегодня: ✅ Сократить время производства Черновики текстов, сценарии, баннеры, раскадровки, референ

4👍3👏1🔥1

3 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC41 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вот такие вот тренды ❝ Выбери здоровый желудок, зубы и медицинскую страховку. Выбери недвижимость и аккуратно выплачивай взносы. Выбери свой первый дом ❞ Выбрали жизнь без искусственных красителей

3👍2

1 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Импульсивные покупки никуда не исчезли. Просто теперь люди принимают решение не у кассы, а в телефоне — за несколько секунд. Что помогает продавать на импульсе: 🟢 Покажите выгоду сразу. Не заставляйте человека искать, почему ему это нужно. «Экономит 5 часов в неделю» работает лучше, чем длинное описание функций. 🟢 Максимально сократите путь до покупки. Каждый лишний клик, регистрация или форма — шанс потерять клие

👍3

29 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC42 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Роскачество представило результаты исследования потребительских предпочтений на рынке безалкогольных напитков. Самыми популярными у россиян оказались фруктовые соки и нектары — их регулярно выбирают 75% опрошенных. В тройку лидеров также вошли компот (64%) и квас (61%). Исследование показывает, что высокий спрос сохраняется не только на привычные соки, но и на традиционные напитки. Газированные напитки выбирают 56%

1👍1

29 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTC41 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Что предпочитаете?

  1. Сок/нектар25%
  2. Компот0%
  3. Квас25%
  4. Вода75%
  5. Морс25%
  6. Молочные коктейли25%
  7. Холодный кофе/чай0%
  8. «Безалкогольный алкоголь»0%
  9. Другое (в комментарии)0%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jun 2026, 12:35 UTCviews —

BusySpace pinned «Сегодня в выпуске — бренд-директор девелопера LEGENDA Ксения Демирчиева и директор по маркетингу группы компаний AdAurum Павел Лубяницкий. Может показаться, что гости нашей студии находятся по разные стороны баррикад, но на деле цель у них одна — сделать…»

26 Jun 2026, 12:35 UTC329 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сегодня в выпуске — бренд-директор девелопера LEGENDA Ксения Демирчиева и директор по маркетингу группы компаний AdAurum Павел Лубяницкий. Может показаться, что гости нашей студии находятся по разные стороны баррикад, но на деле цель у них одна — сделать так, чтобы бизнес приносил деньги. Поэтому мы обсудили: - куда вкладываться, чтобы занять место на высококонкурентном рынке - что нужно выстраивать в первую очередь

🔥4👏3🤩1

25 Jun 2026, 12:27 UTC42 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Поговорим об одном из самых спорных трендов последних лет: так ли хороши электромобили (и зарядные станции к ним), как о них говорят? Обсудили вопрос с одной из сторон — руководитель по франшизе компании PUNKT E Кирилл Черепанов поделился, так ли важна любовь, какие планы у России на электричество и какие вызовы ждут электрокары в будущем. Читайте и делитесь мнениями в комментариях !

4🔥4👍1

24 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC38 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Что стало с «Япошей»? А «Двумя палочками»?

4😱2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @busy_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Что предпочитаете?

  1. Сок/нектар25%
  2. Компот0%
  3. Квас25%
  4. Вода75%
  5. Морс25%
  6. Молочные коктейли25%
  7. Холодный кофе/чай0%
  8. «Безалкогольный алкоголь»0%
  9. Другое (в комментарии)0%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jun 2026, 12:49 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

Почему лиды есть, а продаж — нет?

  1. Качество трафика20%
  2. Скорость обработки заявок20%
  3. Ошибки менеджеров40%
  4. Квалификация клиентов0%
  5. Ошибка в воронке20%
  6. Внутренние процессы40%
  7. Отдел продаж60%
  8. Другое (в комментарии)20%

The shares total 220%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 267,528 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BusySpace” (@busy_space), 85 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/busy_space.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.