...get nothing
😁2
Signed Alexandr

Channel
@business_pepe_official
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,082subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001633457873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @business_pepe_official |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/business_pepe_official |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 1,082 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 1,081 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:54 | 1,083 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:44 | 1,074 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 1,075 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 1,077 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 1,076 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 1,078 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 1,079 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 1,077 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 1,077 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
90 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 71 | 78.9% | |
| custom 5861996610845675576 | 13 | 14.4% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 5.56% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.11% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
...get nothing
😁2
Signed Alexandr
He sold
😁2
Signed Alexandr
Video, posted without a caption
custom 58619966108456755765
Signed Alexandr
Я думаю, коллекция Cashcat на робингуд чейне - новые миледи Change my mind
custom 58619966108456755762❤1
Signed Alexandr
Придумали или еще думаете?
😁7custom 58619966108456755764🥰2
Signed Alexandr
Гм, смарты. $HOOD отработали хорошо, пока что занят усреднением. Видимо, пришли к верхней границе диапазона. Напоминаю, что заходили около $88 за одну акцию, сейчас $105. Тем лучше - чем сильнее актив растёт сейчас, тем меньше он будет расти потом. Логично же, если покупатели закончатся. $CRCL выглядит просто ужасно. Пробой нижней границы, судя по графику, приближается. Сидим около текущих, в планах наращивать шорт…
😁8
Signed Alexandr
FED'S CHAIR WARSH DID NOT SUBMIT A DOT ON THE SEP DOT PLOT Дело в том, что каждый участник FOMC ставит точку на графике напротив того уровня процентной ставки, который он считает обоснованным на конец текущего года, следующего года и в более отдаленной перспективе. Аналитики смотрят на медиану этих точек, чтобы понять, куда ФРС планирует двигать экономику: будут ли ставки расти, падать или останутся неизменными. Н…
Signed Alexandr
Гм, хотел спросить, у Лайтера будет второй дроп? И дают ли поинты за ликвидации?
😁6
Signed Alexandr
Есть еще идея $CRCL и $HOOD шортить. Вроде, крипте плохо, значит, стоксы тоже продолжат падать? Прямая корреляция между активами. Разные стейблы и крипто-нативные приложения потихоньку разводняют влияние TradFi продуктов. Наверное, $40-$50 по $CRCL и около $30 по $HOOD вижу для себя как вполне реалистичный таргет.
😁4
Signed Alexandr
🐸 По результатам последних сделок идём очень хорошо ❤️$ESPORTS — покупал по $0.34 на ликвидациях, продал по $0.047 ❤️$HYPE — отлично удалось купить по $72 и закрыть по $56 ❤️$WLD — шортили вместе с Хейсом, дошли до ликвидаций по $0.5. Старший снова обманул ❤️$HYPE — во второй раз на этом инструменте паттерн голова-плечи отработал хорошо, дошли до шеи. Заходили в шорт по $55.6 с 15 плечом, дошли до ликвидации Пока ч…
😁15
Signed Alexandr
С этого поста мы пришли к 200% прибыли. Держать $ESPORTS, который снижался на более, чем 90%, все еще прибыльнее, чем владеть эфиром - он в свою очередь за это время упал более, чем на 20%. (но это если не покупать токен по $1)
😁4
Signed Alexandr
Хороший момент для продолжения шорта хайпа, известный паттерн голова-плечи-минус депозит. Щас шею будут ломать, если верить второй картинке
😁7
Signed Alexandr
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @business_pepe_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“business Pepe” (@business_pepe_official), 1,082 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/business_pepe_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.