Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 布偶布偶

Channel

布偶布偶

@buou8888

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,836subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003341567138
TypeChannel
Username@buou8888
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 22 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/buou8888

Growth

1,8361,8501,8438 August 2026 — 1,848 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,847 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,850 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,837 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,836 subscribers8 August 202618 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,834–1,852 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 04:331,836-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:181,837-13
11 Aug 2026, 12:221,850+3
8 Aug 2026, 16:141,847-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:171,848first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6998.6%
👍11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 May 2026, 10:44 UTC≈5,510 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

休息了先跑路了,预约的全部取消,表哥们下次再见!

5

21 May 2026, 18:22 UTC≈5,930 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptpc008Photo

蓝色妖姬的花语: 2️⃣5️⃣ 花中新贵,妖艳迷人。 与你相守是一份永恒的承诺。 新贵的你,迷人如你。 承诺是一种酣畅淋漓后的泛滥! 蓝色妖姬,蓝色包臀裙,还有醉人的美甲, 海天一色,温暖了我。 老板(布偶):@buou888

6

21 May 2026, 18:22 UTC≈5,660 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fuge88Photo

tps://t.me/putianlsj 📜【妖谱档案】 • 【妖名】:布偶 @buou888 • 【出没之地】:剑气长城·城北 • 【供奉】:8锭官银 • 【所属一脉】:集大成一体妖 🏆【境界评定】 • 容颜境(颜值):15镜(衣品,妆容,脸蛋,气质都是十分高级,精致。半年过去了依旧忘不了第一次见面时的那种惊艳之感。想把一切赞美的词汇都堆砌在她身上。然而觉得这些词汇也形容不出来她的美感,在她面前我阿良犹如一只哥布林,会自惭形秽。如今6刷,面对这种精致的颜值还是控制不了的会有点紧张。) • 体魄境(身材):15镜(浑身紧致,无一丝赘肉,身高,身型,气质全在我的审美点上。天菜只是形容美女的顶点,而不是她的顶点。只后悔认识晚了。错过了很多时间) • 媚术境(互动/氛围):15镜(课室干净,每次去几乎都看不到上一位道友的痕迹,非常少见,赏心悦目。细节之处看全局,显然她对自己要求也是蛮高的。) • 技法境(服务)

4

30 Apr 2026, 10:09 UTC≈8,250 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

休息啦 姐妹还在莆田开课哦🥳 @zx147258361

1

28 Apr 2026, 10:11 UTC≈8,810 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptpc008Video

在茫茫人海中看了一眼 在万紫千万里开始沉沦 第一眼惊为天人 第二眼怦然心动 第三眼我想拥有你 那怕一分钟 40分钟 80分钟 终有愿望成真时 相见 风华绝代 相识 倾国佳人 相拥 醉生梦死 相交 颠鸾倒凤 相别 依依不舍 相濡与沫时 毕是江湖再见 个人评语:此等尤物若来TG必是全网前几名的存在,遗憾不玩TG。顶颜幻神级别,第一次见到照片就有初恋的感觉,深深被她吸引。目前颜值这块在我心中无人撼动。可惜了兄弟们吃不到,她不想公布,价格虚高,等级评测降了点,如若水费能降点,必是五星。我必天天刷爆她。 25年7月 PTPC队长的一眼万年真神 布偶:@buou888

10

25 Apr 2026, 15:12 UTC≈7,400 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptpc008Video

原来思念是一场病 思念成疾 我生了一场大病 唯独你才能药到病除 你是我的良药,我已痊愈。 执子之手,与子比心。 布偶(老板):@buou888

5👍1

25 Jan 2026, 19:53 UTC≈16,900 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

莆田圆满结束,谢谢莆田表哥的关照及疼爱。

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @buou8888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 473,357 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“布偶布偶” (@buou8888), 1,836 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buou8888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.