Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ㅤㅤְ ⃓ַֿ ͜͝ ⃓ַֿ ͜͝ ִㅤ۫ 𝕮𝗁𑪈𝗎 شُوكولااㅤֵ⇅ ◟

Channel

ㅤㅤְ ⃓ַֿ ͜͝ ⃓ַֿ ͜͝ ִㅤ۫ 𝕮𝗁𑪈𝗎 شُوكولااㅤֵ⇅ ◟

@bunlov33

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

474subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003424990523
TypeChannel
Username@bunlov33
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bunlov33

Growth

474479476.515 September 2026 — 479 subscribers16 September 2026 — 479 subscribers17 September 2026 — 474 subscribers15 September 202617 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 473–480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:40474-5
16 Sept 2026, 00:22479no change
15 Sept 2026, 23:47479first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 474 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held20 (13 September 202615 September 2026)
Views total1,789
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2026, 22:58 UTC4 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

ִֶָ . ࣪ تَريديِ قِناةَه ترتِبَ حِسابات هيَج ?¿ ࣪ . ִֶָ

Signed ໒︩︪݃𖹭ᩙ ۪ 𝘉𝘰𝗍 𝖺꯭ׄ𝓽𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖺 𐴊᳟֩ᰰ𐪃ㅤֵ

15 Sept 2026, 22:46 UTC5 viewsread 16 September 2026

- أكثِࢪ زخَرفة عجبتكِ﹗֢

Signed ໒︩︪݃𖹭ᩙ ۪ 𝘉𝘰𝗍 𝖺꯭ׄ𝓽𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖺 𐴊᳟֩ᰰ𐪃ㅤֵ

15 Sept 2026, 22:34 UTC5 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

تِࢪيدي هيَج مُتتاليات﹗֢𖥻ִ

Signed ໒︩︪݃𖹭ᩙ ۪ 𝘉𝘰𝗍 𝖺꯭ׄ𝓽𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖺 𐴊᳟֩ᰰ𐪃ㅤֵ

15 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC8 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

ִ تَريديِ كِذا تطقيَم مِع فࢪينَدك﹗֢

Signed ໒︩︪݃𖹭ᩙ ۪ 𝘉𝘰𝗍 𝖺꯭ׄ𝓽𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖺 𐴊᳟֩ᰰ𐪃ㅤֵ

15 Sept 2026, 22:10 UTC9 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

᜔ تَريد هِذا الثيَم﹗֢

Signed ໒︩︪݃𖹭ᩙ ۪ 𝘉𝘰𝗍 𝖺꯭ׄ𝓽𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖺 𐴊᳟֩ᰰ𐪃ㅤֵ

15 Sept 2026, 22:01 UTC11 viewsread 16 September 2026
Photo

ㅤִ໒ᩫᰰۣ ✉️ ִ #𝘚𝘶𝓹𝓹𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝖺꯭ׄ𝓽𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖺 𖹭᪶ᩫִׄㅤֵ هلُو قلبيّ ! قناتك أو كروبك نزل تفاعلهم؟ وتريد لسته ترجعَ قناتك أو كروبك تفاعلات و اضافات لليل 💞💞 !! لستة اثينا الافضل بين كل اللستات قبولها 100+ وعشان الي قنواتهم أقل نزلو قبولهم ل30+ تخيلي؟ يعني قبول بسيط ودعم ببلاش !! وِين تلاگين هيچي لستة؟ تعال تنورين لستة اثينا المميزه 👼🏻👼🏻💞💞 !!

Signed ໒︩︪݃𖹭ᩙ ۪ 𝘉𝘰𝗍 𝖺꯭ׄ𝓽𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖺 𐴊᳟֩ᰰ𐪃ㅤֵ

15 Sept 2026, 03:34 UTC78 viewsread 16 September 2026

يَروحي بَس!¡ اعشَقكك يثُوثُو يَروحي وشُكراً على كَلامَك العَسل ده ءمَحح ءمَحح ءمَحح وان شاءلله افكَااري الثَانية تعجَبكُمم همِين💕

15 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC81 viewsread 16 September 2026

⁣💌 وصلتك رسالة جديدة ⏱ وقت الرسالة: 2026/09/14 - 09:15:29 PM ---- هلا تشويمتي ،، ادري متاخر بس وربي اخ ثيمك خرافي موت خصوصا زخرفه اسمك قديش تطورتي وابدعتي وواووو نشرك حرفيا قمه بالابداع اقدر اقول انك افضل وحده باختيار الثيمات والتنسيق موت يجنن والفكره الاخيره ابدعتتتي حيل بشكل مايقدر احد يوصف كمية ابداعك 🥹🥹!!! كنت موجوده ببداياتك وقديش شفت انك تطورتي بشكل وافكار تارييخيه حيل الافضل دايما وابدا - ثياني . ---- - تبرع

14 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC100 viewsread 16 September 2026

عمُوماً هاد البُوت @telegraph يُومين وانزَل له شَرحح+++عَندي هُواي افكَار تعجَبكُمم والله 💕

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bunlov33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

ㅤ ⃘྄ֿ݇ ܼ ㅤU𝗇ׄ ꞗυ︩𐐫𝗇᳢ׄ ძֺ︫︩ꫀ꯱ֺ֪𝑒ɾ𝗍ׅㅤׅ꩙᷐᷎ׅㅤׄㅤׅ

  1. ֵ ⫾⫾⵿ ֹ 𝂅 %𝟶 𝂅 𝅄 ׄ7%
  2. ֵ ⫾⫾⵿ ֹ 𝂅 %𝟻𝟶 𝂅 𝅄 ׄ5%
  3. ֵ ⫾⫾⵿ ֹ 𝂅 %𝟷𝟶𝟶 𝂅 𝅄 ׄ81%
  4. ֵ ⫾⫾⵿ ֹ 𝂅 %𝟷𝟶 𝂅 𝅄 ׄ7%
  5. ㅤㅤㅤׄ ︵͜︵ㅤׅㅤׄㅤ︵͜︵ㅤㅤִ7%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2026 to 15 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤㅤְ ⃓ַֿ ͜͝ ⃓ַֿ ͜͝ ִㅤ۫ 𝕮𝗁𑪈𝗎 شُوكولااㅤֵ⇅ ◟” (@bunlov33), 474 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bunlov33.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.