Shill me potential gems πβ¨

Channel
Bullish Ghost callππ
@bullishghostcall
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
27subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002413012517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bullishghostcall |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 17 October 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bullishghostcall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 27 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 28 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 28 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 October 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
788 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯° | 266 | 33.8% | |
| β€ | 176 | 22.3% | |
| π₯ | 125 | 15.9% | |
| π | 92 | 11.7% | |
| π | 66 | 8.38% | |
| π€© | 61 | 7.74% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 2 | 0.254% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 788 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2024 to 6 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/diomedes_trojanbot
π₯°24π₯11β€7π€©7π6π6
Shill me potential gems in the comments ππ
π₯2
tg : https://t.me/POPTRIXCTO https://x.com/Poptrix_CTO https://dexscreener.com/solana/9j5ldqhmtuxavffaofedfdyqzszwsacr1hec3md5xhdf Get ready for the next big meme coin sensationβ$POPTRIX! With massive community backing and buzz, $POPTRIX is set to skyrocket. Analysts are already eyeing a 100x potential as it gains traction in the crypto world. Don't miss your chance to be part of the movement before it blasts offβ¦
β€20π₯12π9π₯°9π6π€©3
shill me your Gems in comment! let all win to the moon
Shill me your Gemsπ Let's all win to the moonπ
Shill me potential gems in the comments ππ
shill me your Gems in comment! let all win to the moon
π$BNRY π Pre-Sale now Live π The $BNRY journey to the moon has begun on Solana. Will you be a part of the BNRYARMY when we reach the moon? ππ Buy now: https://pump.fun/D2agkLhXhM51CF5LpvvJmEBEHzEgKQntGAwUiC39pump π https://bnry.xyz βοΈ https://x.com/BNRYxyz π±https://t.me/+GkaWF6juqJo1ZTU0 01111000 01101111
π₯°52π₯24β€14π11π11π€©10
shill me your Gems in comment! let all win to the moon
I'm looking for a new or old potential project πππ Shill me πΆπ·
β€βπ₯2
I'm looking for a new project πππ Shill me πΆπ·
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bullishghostcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bullishghostcall named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 β 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBullish Ghost callππβ (@bullishghostcall), 27 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bullishghostcall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.