Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

양봉업자 투자일기

@bullishbee11

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41,773subscribers

+537 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003440775529
TypeChannel
Username@bullishbee11
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bullishbee11

Growth

41,23641,77341,504.57 August 2026 — 41,236 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,236 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,252 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,282 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,597 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,615 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,630 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,695 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,773 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +537. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,155–41,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:1541,773+78
13 Aug 2026, 08:1441,695+65
12 Aug 2026, 09:0241,630+15
11 Aug 2026, 08:1241,615+18
10 Aug 2026, 09:0441,597+315
9 Aug 2026, 12:3341,282+30
8 Aug 2026, 14:2341,252+16
7 Aug 2026, 19:3041,236no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:2841,236first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.7%
avg views ÷ 41,773 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,500
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held30 (6 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total434,440
Reactions total14,092
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

14,092 reactions across 30 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10,73276.2%
5013.56%
🙈4923.49%
👍4503.19%
🔥3552.52%
👏2962.10%
🙏2922.07%
🙉2041.45%
🥰1681.19%
🎉1551.10%
🌭1120.795%
😇700.497%
😁470.334%
🤣470.334%
🎃400.284%
🙊360.255%
👻220.156%
🤩170.121%
🍓130.092%
👌120.085%
3 further kinds310.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,092reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC≈4,240 views84 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🌇 양봉업자 뉴스픽 8/10 (월) 오후 4시 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ ▶️ 시황 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🖥 반도체·AI • 일본 니케이 2% 상승, AI 주식 랠리 주도 • 일본 정부 사이버 방어 정책에 최첨단 AI 활용 검토 • 한국 정부 반도체 제조시설 및 AI 데이터센터 대규모 투자 추진 논의 🌍 지정학 • 미국 중부사령부 8월 9일 이란 해상 봉쇄 실행, 55척 항로 변경, 2척 무력화, 20척 이상 함정 배치 • 이란과 미국 협상 난항 지속, 호르무즈 해협 재개방 불확실성 유지 • 예멘 후티가 모카항 미사일, 드론 공격, 7명 사망, 30명 부상, 드론 11대 격추 📉 매크로 • 미국 7월 고용 감소 264,000명, 실업률 상승, 경제활동참가율 61.4% 기록 • 일본은행 7월 정책 회의에서 일부 위원 금리 인상 속도 가속 제

76🥰52👍1

10 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC≈7,600 views350 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

다들 인스타 스레드 보셨죠 ?! 이미지 다시 올려드립니다 일단 지금 튀어오르는 섹터들이 몇몇 보이는데 [팔란티어, 기업용SW, 보안, 광통신 등] 2번 약조정에서도 잘 버티는지 확인하면 됩니다

28847👍7🎉5🔥3

9 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈14,300 views493 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

나스닥 시나리오 대략적으로 이런 그림

42433🔥16👏11🤓9

9 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC≈14,200 views441 reactionsread 10 August 2026

제 계산이 맞다면 1~2주 동안 지수 랠리, 8월 마지막 주에 약조정구간에 진입할 확률이 높은데 1~2주 동안 랠리 줄 때 ETF 매도하고 약조정구간에서 주도주로 갈아타는 전략을 계획하고 있습니다 (물론 지수 랠리 안 보여주고 상승추세 이탈하면 바로 도망갈 준비도 같이)

35846👏19😇10🔥8

9 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈14,600 views1,057 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

텔레그램 투자 채널 구독자 순위 9등 찍었네요 ㄷㄷ 텔레그램에 계신 41,286분 감사하단 말씀 전합니다!! https://www.threads.com/@bullish_bee/post/Db0fnooD1mg?hl=ko

874👏117🔥2819🥰19

9 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈14,800 views447 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

[2023년 폭등 타임라인] 11월 1일: QRA 장기채 증액 속도 둔화 11월 1일: FOMC 기준금리 동결 11월 3일: 고용시장 둔화 신호 11월 14일: 예상보다 낮은 CPI 이 타임라인이 2026년에도 반복되고 있습니다. [2026년 폭등 타임라인] 7월 29일: FOMC 기준금리 동결 8월 5일: QRA 장기채 비중 동결 8월 7일: 고용시장 둔화 신호 여기까지는 소름돋게 똑같이 가고 있고, 관건은 8월 12일 CPI 발표 https://www.instagram.com/p/Dbz9fxOATy_/?img_index=1

370👍42🔥14🙏13🥰8

9 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈14,500 views491 reactionsread 10 August 2026

7월 28일에 분석해둔 내용인데 지금 이 분위기대로 흘러가고 있습니다..! 미국장 중심으로 상승장이 시작됐다 보고 있습니다. 다시 가드를 내리고 현금 비중을 투입해야하는 시기.. 정리해서 올려드릴게요

41738👍22🥰8🔥6

9 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC≈15,000 views575 reactionsread 10 August 2026

그리고 비트코인은 삼성전자 5만원 시절이라고 생각합니다 지겨운 횡보장.. but 관심 놓치면 안 되는 구간

47557🔥26🤩17

9 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC≈15,100 views673 reactionsread 10 August 2026

미국증시 기준 상승장이 다시 시작됐다고 봅니다 미국증시가 랠리 보이면 삼전 하닉도 반등장에 들어서지 않을까 생각하고 있습니다 미장: 추세추종 매매 국장: 단타 매매 이렇게 봐야할듯

58953👏15🌭8🙈8

8 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈15,600 views785 reactionsread 10 August 2026

날씨가 갑자기 선선해졌네요 ㅎㅎ 이제야 살겠습니다.. 주말인데 다들 주식 생각은 약간 접어두고 에너지 충전하는 시간 가져보아요!

617🥰85👍50👏20🌭13

7 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈16,400 views542 reactionsread 10 August 2026

나스닥은 좋네요 흐름 메모리 때문에 같이 내려간거 다 말아올린게 힘이 좋다!

458👍55🌭16🎉13

7 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈16,400 views556 reactionsread 10 August 2026

메모리 힘이 너무 없네요..;;

🙈393😇60🔥51🤣34🙊18

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @bullishbee11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 885,841 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“양봉업자 투자일기” (@bullishbee11), 41,773 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bullishbee11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.