Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Bulletproftlink Broadcast
@bulletproftlink
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
985subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001306053996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bulletproftlink |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bulletproftlink |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 985 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 988 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 995 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 999 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 1,002 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 1,002 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 69.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2024 to 14 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Bulletproftlink Broadcast pinned Deleted message
Bulletproftlink Broadcast pinned Deleted message
Bulletproftlink Broadcast pinned Deleted message
https://t.me/dogshouse_bot/join?startapp=-CuHu_79QgexBdQeqf3ukw Invite DOGS Community!
❤1
Signed Anthrax Staff
This one is listed on binance. So subscribe this one to get some extra money. Thanks https://t.me/Euritebot?start=r01537166054
Signed Anthrax Staff
t.me/catsgang_bot/join?startapp=tSJOVkaRzn8eY87tTlK1r Meow, lets see who is OG 😼
Signed Anthrax Staff
https://t.me/booms_io_bot/start?startapp=bro5415708260 BOOMS Game - Earn tokens with real value even before the airdrop! Take your welcome bonus: 💸 5,000 Coins as a first-time gift 🔥 50,000 Coins if you have Telegram Premium
Signed Anthrax Staff
https://t.me/dogshouse_bot/join?startapp=GuhqMaDIQm2uBrjQhMuJyA Who let the DOGS out?
❤1
Signed Anthrax Staff
❤️HELLO EVERYONE❤️, Do you need a Virtual Assistant? I can be your virtual assistant. I can provide the service of * B2B Lead Generation, * Data Entry, * Product Listing, * Social Media Management, * Basic design, * Basic video editing, or any other project based on your instructions. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Looking forward to working with you.
❤4👍2
Signed Anthrax Staff
❤️HELLO EVERYONE❤️, Are you looking for a B2B Lead Generation & LinkedIn lead Generation Expert for your email campaign? Look no further because you've arrived at the right place! I have 5 years of experience building prospect lists. I can give you a geo-targeted fresh B2B prospect list based on your criteria. Areas of Service:- 1) B2B Lead generation & Web research for specific companies, industries, organizatio…
❤4
Signed Anthrax Staff
❤️HELLO EVERYONE❤️, I hope you're all doing great. We are excited to launch a new service named ⚡️ATXVault⚡️. This service hosts a robust set of features like 2fa bypass, strong cookies and logs. Our services come at a lower price point – only $200 for the license and $150 for renew. Here's the list of our services: - Gmail (With 2fa bypass and cookies) - Office (With 2fa bypass and cookies) - Outlook (With 2fa b…
❤5✍1
Signed Anthrax Staff
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bulletproftlink. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bulletproftlink named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bulletproftlink Broadcast” (@bulletproftlink), 985 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bulletproftlink.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.