Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BUTAC - Bufale Un Tanto Al Chilo

Channel

BUTAC - Bufale Un Tanto Al Chilo

@bufaleuntantoalchilo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,731subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001062552894
TypeChannel
Username@bufaleuntantoalchilo
Created21 June 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bufaleuntantoalchilo

Growth

2,7142,7312,722.55 August 2026 — 2,715 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,715 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,714 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,718 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,724 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,728 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,731 subscribers5 August 202626 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,711–2,734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 03:132,731+3
23 Aug 2026, 02:162,728+4
19 Aug 2026, 06:532,724+6
10 Aug 2026, 08:262,718+4
6 Aug 2026, 22:322,714-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:182,715no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:352,715first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.1%
avg views ÷ 2,731 subscribers
Avg views / post
467
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (16 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,736
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC112 viewsread 7 August 2026

I famosi libretti di risparmio e gli aggiornamenti Su alcune testate italiane a fine luglio è apparsa una notizia che a noi suona di déjà vu: l’ennesimo fortuito ritrovamento di libretti di risparmio. Titolava La Stampa ad articolo appena uscito: Trova in un cassetto libretti di risparmio vecchi di 50 anni Il Fatto Quotidiano: Apre un... https://www.butac.it/libretti-di-risparmio-aggiornamenti/

6 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC310 viewsread 7 August 2026

Il femore gigante e le civiltà scomparse Estate, tempo di leggerezza anche su BUTAC, specie visto che sono in viaggio e fatico a stare sempre sul pezzo: da oggi, oltre ai soliti articoli sull’attualità e la cronaca recenti, troverete anche qualche approfondimento su tematiche un po’ più leggere. Ci è stato segnalato un testo di ... https://www.butac.it/femore-gigante/

5 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC383 viewsread 7 August 2026

Latte crudo e bambini A seguito della morte del povero Mattia Maestri, scomparso dopo nove anni di coma vegetativo insorto dopo aver mangiato un formaggio fatto col latte crudo all’età di quattro anni, tante testate hanno parlato dei pericoli causati dal consumo di latte crudo e formaggi derivati. ANSA a seguito... https://www.butac.it/latte-crudo-bambini/

4 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC454 viewsread 7 August 2026

Le ondate di calore degli anni 30 e 40 A metà luglio sul profilo Facebook di Franco Battaglia è stato pubblicato un post con un grafico che ci è stato segnalato per delle verifiche. Post e grafico li trovate qui sotto: Il grafico è vero, come dimostrano le fonti che sono riportate in piccolo subito sotto. Il problema difatti non... https://www.butac.it/ondate-di-calore-anni-30/

3 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC581 viewsread 7 August 2026

L’Italia ha sospeso l’accordo di Schengen con la Spagna? Diciamolo chiaramente: no, l’Italia non ha sospeso l’accordo di Schengen con la Spagna, eppure – a parte rare eccezioni – i titoli della maggior parte dei quotidiani italiani sembrano raccontare proprio questo. L’unico che prova a fare realmente chiarezza è Il Post, che usa la... https://www.butac.it/italia-schengen-spagna/

31 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC668 viewsread 7 August 2026

Confondere le acque – Roggero, migranti e rapine Ci segnalate un video su Facebook, condiviso con un lungo testo in cui si sostiene che si tratti di un video della rapina al gioielliere Roggero. Il post, molto lungo, comincia così: Per tutti quelli che sono contro Roggero vorrei che vedeste un pezzettino di video della rapina con l’audio,... https://www.butac.it/roggero-immigrati-e-rapine/

30 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC609 viewsread 7 August 2026

No, Trump non ha vinto le elezioni tre volte Tanti stanno parlando della dichiarazione di Donald Trump durante la cena dei giornalisti del 24 luglio 2026, così ad esempio il TG di La7: Trump al galà per la stampa: “Mi ricandido nel 2028”. Ma può farlo? La Repubblica: Un cappellino rosso con la scritta ‘Trump 2028’: così, il... https://www.butac.it/trump-tre-elezioni/

29 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC619 viewsread 7 August 2026

Il governo rende imputabili i quattordicenni? Il 23 luglio molte testate giornalistiche italiane, come Repubblica, hanno titolato: Ok alla “norma anti maranza”: minori imputabili da 14 anni. Meloni: “Chi sbaglia paga” Oppure La Stampa: Norma anti-maranza, Salvini: “Da genitore dico è giusto punire chi ha 14 anni”. Polemica su... https://www.butac.it/governo-imputabili-quattordicenni/

28 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC617 viewsread 7 August 2026

Gattini, incendi e vecchie conoscenze Su svariate testate italiane sono apparsi, nei giorni scorsi, articoli che dimostrano (non che ce ne fosse bisogno) il pessimo stato del giornalismo italiano. Titola SkyTg24 il 22 luglio 2026: Incendi in Calabria, gatti usati per innescare i roghi: taglia di mille euro sui piromani E nelle prime ... https://www.butac.it/gatti-incendi-aidaa/

27 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC616 viewsread 7 August 2026

“Odio antioccidentale” e narrazioni a senso unico Anche su alcune bacheche di miei contatti ho trovato circolare il posterino che vedete qui sotto, ma a noi l’avete segnalato sul profilo TikTok del segretario della Lega Giovani Roma: Ma siamo sicuri stia circolando in maniera virale dopo quanto successo a Berlino, anzi, probabile ne stiano... https://www.butac.it/odio-antioccidentale/

24 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC711 viewsread 7 August 2026

Creme solari, tumori della pelle e fai da te… Nota redazionale: articolo di follow-up a “La crema solare nel flusso del sangue” (15 giugno 2026) dove trattavamo il post di “Mr.Pool” con lo studio JAMA sull’assorbimento e lo studio McGill di Alli et al. Qui trattiamo un filone diverso, con un nuovo studio strumentalizzato e un... https://www.butac.it/creme-solari-tumori-pelle/

23 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC698 viewsread 7 August 2026

Bandiere rimosse e malinformazione Oggi procediamo con una sorta di prebunking, visto che la storia che sto per affrontare in Italia ancora non l’ho vista circolare. Ma la mia famiglia si trova in UK, e mi hanno segnalato una notizia che ne ricalca altre che abbiamo trattato negli ultimi tempi, pertanto abbiamo pensato sia... https://www.butac.it/uk-bandiere-rimosse/

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @bufaleuntantoalchilo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,282,346 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

il Post
@ilpost_official · 47,387
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
Suggerimenti di Telegram
@TelegramTipsIT · 184,631
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BUTAC - Bufale Un Tanto Al Chilo” (@bufaleuntantoalchilo), 2,731 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bufaleuntantoalchilo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.