8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,092–3,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 19:33
3,094
-2
22 Aug 2026, 21:14
3,096
-1
19 Aug 2026, 21:09
3,097
-1
16 Aug 2026, 14:55
3,098
-4
12 Aug 2026, 23:23
3,102
-6
10 Aug 2026, 04:41
3,108
-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:27
3,109
-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:04
3,110
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
48.0%
avg views ÷ 3,094 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
11 (24 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
7,430
Reactions total
131
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
229 reactions across 11 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
37
16.2%
😁
37
16.2%
👏
32
14.0%
🤡
25
10.9%
🤣
18
7.86%
👍
13
5.68%
🤔
13
5.68%
🔥
12
5.24%
🥴
10
4.37%
🐳
8
3.49%
😡
6
2.62%
👎
5
2.18%
💯
4
1.75%
🍾
2
0.873%
🙏
2
0.873%
🤬
2
0.873%
🥰
2
0.873%
😢
1
0.437%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В общем-то не было большим секретом, что наши чиновники - чемпионы по лизоблюдству и лицемерию, а также мастера спорта по строительству Потемкинских деревень. Но сегодня они превзошли все прежние достижения, надо признать. И оторвались от ближайших конкурентов на недосягаемую дистанцию.
Внезапно в ночь перед приездом сами знаете кого на заправке КНП в Железногорске вдруг появился бензин. Да не просто появился, а по …
Друзья, отложите дела, отмените планы и, по возможности, спрячьтесь дома за занавеской.
В Красноярск приезжает...
ну, сами знаете кто.
С какими целями приезжает, официально неизвестно.
О визите в Железногорск тоже пока ничего не сообщают.
Но лучше заранее отойти от окон. Мало ли.
История учит, что в такие дни безопаснее всего выглядеть как комнатное растение.
Дороги, конечно, перекроют.
Все.
На всякий случай.
До особ…
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Последнее время, читая новостные паблики Железногорска, невольно ловишь себя на мысли: когда нынешний глава города Дмитрий Михайлович Чернятин завершит свою непростую работу на этом посту, горожане, возможно, будут отмечать это событие так, что порвут не один десяток баянов.
Но так ли это будет на самом деле?
История у нас, как известно, имеет удивительное свойство повторяться. Достаточно вспомнить любого из предыдущ…
Сначала казалось, что город просто проснулся. А оказалось, что проснулся слишком бодро.
Как когда-то пела незабвенная Эдита Станиславовна: «А город подумал, ученья идут». И, надо признать, у города были все основания так подумать.
Утром на станции Болотная в Железногорске обнаружили предмет, подозрительно напоминавший взрывное устройство. Что именно выдало в нем эту склонность, специалисты деликатно умалчивают. Возмо…
"Давным-давно в одной стране жили люди. И были они несчастны. Потому что все, за что они только ни брались, получалось у них через жопу. Спутники у них не запускались, а если и запускались, то падали. Машины получались уродскими и не ездили. Депутаты, которых они избирали в парламент, оказывались мудаками и гандонами. По дорогам, которые они строили, они же сами и не могли проехать, - а если даже могли, то собирались…
Немного промахнулось общественное мнение с оценкой годового дохода кандидата в депутаты Законодательного Собрания края Дмитрия Никифоровича Колупаева, человека, безусловно, уважаемого. Хотя, если бы не выборы, многие из нас так и жили бы в счастливом неведении.
Большинство участников опроса решило, что за 2025 год он заработал немногим больше 30 миллионов рублей. Что ж, логика понятна. Когда речь идет о руководителе …
Есть у чиновников одна удивительная суперспособность. Если долго не смотреть на проблему, она иногда сама превращается в акт выполненных работ.
Вот и в Железногорский городской суд поступило дело, в котором фигурируют три человека, муниципальный контракт почти на четыре миллиона рублей и мусор, который решил, что официальные полигоны это для слабаков.
По версии следствия, директор подрядной организации вывез отходы в…
Пока в интернете обсуждают зарплату губернатора Котюкова (как и все кандидаты в депутаты он обязан предоставить сведения о своих доходах и имуществе), мы , железногорцы, больше интересуемся заработной платой кандидата Колупаева. И мы узнали. Честно сказать, немного ох&ели. А давайте мы подержим интригу, и запилим опрос? Вы проголосуете, а потом мы опубликуем ту цифру, которая нам стала известна. Итак: доход генеральн…
❤2🐳1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @bud_jacket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 990,951 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пиджачок Че” (@bud_jacket), 3,094 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bud_jacket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
