Я не делала это 2 года... А вчера... Я написала стихотворение. Да, все не в тему канала. Но Поэзия - это то, с чем я иду много мучительных лет. То пишется, то молчится. А вчера... Послушайте!..
❤14😢4🔥3👏2🤔1😭1

Channel
@bubnovaspeak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
427subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001252500619 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bubnovaspeak |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bubnovaspeak |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 427 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:19 | 429 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 429 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
202 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 29.2% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 8.91% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 6.93% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 4.46% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 3.47% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 3.47% | |
| custom 5451814216031809603 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.98% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 1.98% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.98% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| custom 5271783484929615967 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.495% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я не делала это 2 года... А вчера... Я написала стихотворение. Да, все не в тему канала. Но Поэзия - это то, с чем я иду много мучительных лет. То пишется, то молчится. А вчера... Послушайте!..
❤14😢4🔥3👏2🤔1😭1
За деньги "Да", или "Поможешь?" Слушаем на скорости 1,5😁 Ценю ваше время! А у вас бывает, что обращаются "за помощью" без взаимоинтереса? Как вы защищаете свои границы (если защищаете)? #бубнова_психологияобщения
🔥3✍1👏1💯1
Этот день войдет в историю страны. Как и эти годы. Эти времена! Паника. Нервы. Стресс. Страх. И все же опора и стабилизация - в нас самих! 💪 Послушайте, пожалуйста! Возможно, это откликнется! Возможно, укрепит! Или даст повод для размышлений! #бубнова_актуальное
❤8👍5👏3🤔1🙏1
О своих интимных желаниях проще говорить...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥2👏1🤨1
Роды, Данила Багров и причем тут пиво Ужасно хочется с вами поделиться!😊 3 июня 2016 года я родила вроде в 15:35 😁 сына Данилу. Рожала я неправильно, "в глаза", так что на выписке у меня были кровавые белки, буквально синяки под глазами и выглядела я, как "пьющая женщина - горе семьи"😂 Назвали его так в честь Данилы Багрова из "Брата" (ровно в свои 12 лет я так решила после просмотра фильма😁). Как положено, в бер…
❤16🥰7custom 54518142160318096035
Для девушек. Есть ли среди вас те, кому не хватает уверенности и знаний в общении с мужчинами? Аноним опрос
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👀3🌚1custom 52717834849296159671
Так что по поводу соблазна? - Почему женщине не обязательно соблазнять? - Гендерный парадокс соблазна! - Флирт женщинам, соблазн - мужчинам! Об этом и не только в голосовом посте🌞😈 Жду вас в комментариях, давайте обсудим😊 #бубнова_отношения
🔥6❤4🤔1
Поговорим о соблазне?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔2👀1
Рисуем и соблазняем🍓 31 мая я и мой коллега и соратник @Brekhov80 выступим на необычном мероприятии. 🔞 SEX ART — это арт-вечер, где можно рисовать свои самые горячие фантазии на холсте под бокал игристого 🍸 Без осуждения. Без «это странно». Тема вечера: «Искусство соблазна».💋 Мы проведем нетривиальный формат лекции-обсуждения, без банальных лайфхаков из глянца, именно мужской и женский взгляд на тему вечера. Все с…
🔥8❤4🌚2👀1
Как все успевать? Был от вас запрос: "Как все успевать?:) оптимизация рабочего времени, планирование "вдолгую". Поэтапно отвечаю! 💪 Рекомендую слушать на скорости 1,5. Задавайте вопросы, уточнения в комментариях, не стесняйтесь😁💪 #бубнова_саморазвитие P.S. К сексу мы вернемся😁💪☺️Новые посты уже ждут публикации и вашего внимания
✍3👏2❤1🥰1
Партизанский секс Мульоны текстов, советов, что женщина должна себя проявлять во время близости. Стонать, кричать (не от боли❗️), извиваться, что-то шептаться, в общем, выходить за рамки "ноль реакций, работаем".💪 Мужчин это заводит, вдохновляет, ласкает эго, флешбечит в порно ("я как в кино")... В общем, они всеми конечностями за. Не поверите! Это работает и в нашу сторону! Конечно, приятно, что мужчина подает п…
🔥11😁7🤗5👏3⚡2👍2😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bubnovaspeak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О своих интимных желаниях проще говорить...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Для девушек. Есть ли среди вас те, кому не хватает уверенности и знаний в общении с мужчинами? Аноним опрос
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Поговорим о соблазне?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Писать голосовые посты проще и быстрее. Я бы смогла постить хоть каждый день - полезного контента море! Хотите?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ближайший пост по какой теме интересен?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вам нравится менять внешний образ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 725,365 of 1,601,189entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бубнова говорит” (@bubnovaspeak), 427 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bubnovaspeak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.