Channel
@btsmsapi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
558subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003907166125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btsmsapi |
| Created | 20 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btsmsapi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 558 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 558 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (20 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,577 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【比特API接码 | BitAPI SMS】 🇺🇸🇨🇦 美/加一手API接码服务 | Premium US & CA SMS API Service 全平台支持 / All Platforms：微信, TikTok, X, Telegram, Temu, Amazon, etc. 支持留卡 30–90 天 | Card retention 30–90 days 定制服务 / Custom Support：未列出项目可联系客服 | Custom setup available 📩 联系客服 / Support：@bite_api 📢 官方频道 / Channel：https://t.me/btsmsapi 💬 交流讨论 / Group：https://t.me/bitapi888 🤖 双向机器人 / Bot：@nkkkkkk_bot #海外接码 #美国接码 #接码API #留卡接码 #SMSAPI
【比特API接码】出售美国，加拿大API接码服务 微信、QQ、抖音、快手、阿里 小红书、支付宝、拼多多、网易云 快达票，麦座 所有项目均可留卡30-90天，上方没有的项目可联系下方客服 联系人:@bite_api 频道: https://t.me/btsmsapi 交流群: https://t.me/bitapi888 双向联系机器人 @nkkkkkk_bot 【BitAPI SMS】Selling US and Canada API SMS verification code(SMS OTP) services for WeChat, Twitter/Twitter, TikTok, Facebook, Telegram, WhatsApp, Amazon, Walmart, Tinder, and Temu. All services allow for card retention of 30-90 days. For s…
API接口服务器已恢复可正常使用
API接口服务器升级维护中预计23点恢复
新增一个机器人👋👋 @nkkkkkk_bot 双向后可通过机器人进行联系
whatsApp加拿大接码也是没毛病 有会做的欢迎来测试
加拿大斗鱼也非常丝滑👍👍👍 📱需要的联系 @bite_api 📱交流群 https://t.me/bitapi888 祝各位老板生意红火，八方来财，万事盈利。 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
📱加拿大稳定来码嘎嘎顺👍，接受预定🤕🔥🔥🔥🔥 📱需要的联系 @bite_api 📱交流群 https://t.me/bitapi888 祝各位老板发财 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
加拿大号码库存情况 华住会 0.02U 库存 20w 拼多多 0.01U 库存 50w 滴滴 0.01U 库存 15w 沃尔玛 0.05U 库存 5w 快达票 0.01U 库存10w amazon 0.02U 库存 0 大麦加优酷 0.03U 库存 5w 支持打包，价格可优惠，可测试
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @btsmsapi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 934,799 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“比特api上货通知” (@btsmsapi), 558 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btsmsapi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.