бонжур!
здесь про ма́ркетинг, брендинг и образование
👩🏻🎓 автор @miladvdn | Мила Давидян
BA: медиакоммуникации
MSc: управление высокотехнологичным бизнесом
🎞 inst: bittersweet_traagedy
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 143–145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 21:30
144
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:13
144
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
87.9%
avg views ÷ 144 subscribers
Avg views / post
127
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
12 (17 June 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
633
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
591
Videos
21
Links
39
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
120 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5388834980266789689
33
27.5%
custom 5461054743679889650
27
22.5%
custom 5413639219560075016
20
16.7%
😭
14
11.7%
custom 5299010966246175479
10
8.33%
custom 5451714942157724312
9
7.50%
custom 5388880515510055595
7
5.83%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
01. «Точки контакта. Простые идеи для улучшения вашего маркетинга» — Игорь Манн, Дмитрий Турусин
О том, что маркетинг начинается не с рекламного поста, а с каждого взаимодействия человека с брендом. Книга помогает посмотреть на бизнес глазами клиента и найти десятки маленьких мест, где можно сделать коммуникацию лучше.
02. «ZAG. Манифест другого маркетинга» — Марти Ньюмейер
Книга о том, как перестать быть «еще одн…
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Интернет нашел новую тему для обсуждения — вакансию сторисмейкера с требованием делать 20–25 сторис каждый день
⏮Запрлата не смущает, но смущает цифра⏭
Я правда не понимаю, зачем бренду ежедневно публиковать 20–25 сторис. Чем длиннее цепочка, тем больше людей отсеивается по пути. Конечно, частично все зависит от качества контента, но рассчитывать, что аудитория каждый день будет смотреть 25 историй от одного бренда…
[тихо не будет, ведь это форум шум]
настало время и здесь поделиться небольшим рассказом о моей поездке на юбилейный пятый форум 🤍
всем, кто хочет быть причастным к одному из самых ярких и масштабных мероприятий в сфере медиа и журналистики, настоятельно рекомендую подписаться на соцсети центра «ШУМ» и следить за новостями
💙вк
✈️тг
с прошлого года «ШУМ» стал круглогодичным, а это значит, что ивентов ребята провод…
«Нормальных smm нет на рынке»
Последние несколько дней провожу в threads, где, естественно, у меня вся лента в теме smm, маркетинга и дизайна
В адрес smm-специалистов часто вижу тезис из заголовка 🔼
Читаю истории предпринимателей, которые распространяют такие заявления и вижу, что за этим скрывается:
- Отсутствие онбординга, где человеку рассказывают про проект/продукт и его маркетинг
- Великое нежелание занимат…
[ первый курс магистратуры — всё ]
мне кажется, что я и моргнуть не успела!
так быстро пролетело это время)
еще вчера я радовалась, что поступила, а сегодня уже усердно думаю о теме ВКР и моменте, когда напишу «founder» в шапке профиля
ИТМО меняет людей и это бесспорно
я чувствую, как изменился мой тип мышления, как окрепла теоретическая база и сколько появилось практических навыков. а самое ценное — я все чаще ло…
с академической мобильностью в Венгрию не сложилось, поэтому вернемся к основному понту, который у меня остался 👍
сейчас поговорим о том, каково учиться в одном из топ-5.
#StipendiumHungaricum
ребят, я НЕ знаю, как это комментировать:
Dear Applicant,
Tempus Public Foundation hereby wishes to inform you about the result of your Stipendium Hungaricum application.
We regret to inform you that based on the available budget your application could not be accepted as it exceeds the maximum number of scholarship holders to be awarded for the academic year 2026/2027.
As a result, you cann…
😭14
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @btrswtrgd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сколько сторис подряд вы обычно готовы посмотреть у одного аккаунта?
3-584%
6-107%
11-200%
Смотрю все, если интересно9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bittersweet ✶ traagedy” (@btrswtrgd), 144 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btrswtrgd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
